Overcoming the legacy of the past? Analyzing the modes of governance used by the Polish agricultural producer groups

Abstract

Th e cooperative movement in Poland has a long but diffi cult history, which has caused farmers to have an aversion to cooperatives. Nonetheless, in the early 1990s, the fi rst farmers' cooperative marketing organizations, which were called agricultural producer groups, appeared in the market. Th ese groups are bottom-up, voluntary organizations the primary purpose of which is to jointly sell their members' output. In this paper, it is investigated why the new forms of governance, namely cooperative arrangements, were chosen, and we evaluate the implications of these choices on the market success of these groups. Empirical data were collected from 62 producer groups in one Polish province. We found that the groups were typically functioning as associations, unions, and limited liability companies. Th e factors that had an impact on the choices made were the number of members and the specifi c investment per member. Additionally, if the initial investment level was low, not only set-up and operational costs but also tax considerations played a role in the decision. Th erefore, we argue that the new bottom-up cooperatives, which are theoretically suitable when the start-up capital is high or the number of members is large, will gradually be recognized and accepted in the market despite the fact that these cooperatives have a "bad reputation" caused by the socialist legacy. Th e new cooperative development trend confi rms this argument.

Social Innovation in Community Energy in Europe: A Review of the Evidence

“…However, this seems to be an initiative arising from the business sector, rather than a bona fide citizens' movement (Rabiega, 2018; telephone interview). One possible reason for the lack of energy cooperatives in Poland may be that the cooperative model is negatively associated in the minds of citizens with the state socialism promoted by the communist regimes before 1990 (Beckmann et al, 2015).…”

Legal form of agricultural entities as a factor in ensuring the sustainability of the economic performance of agriculture

“…As with business companies, the cooperative members purchase shares, but the administrative costs are lower than in the case of business companies. One feature of the cooperative is the private property of its members, as well as the fact that members can withdraw the value of their shares any time (Beckmann et al 2015).…”

Context and agency in urban community energy initiatives: An analysis of six case studies from the Baltic Sea Region

“…Cultural barriers refer to the distrust felt by Polish citizens towards cooperative and collective models of social organisation. This is due to the fact that cooperatives are negatively associated with state socialism (Beckmann et al, 2015). Furthermore, there is a general lack of interest among Polish citizens in renewable energies due to its dependence on domestic coal.…”