Overcoming the Curse of Hydrocarbon: Goals and Governance in the Oil Funds of Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan

Abstract

This paper discusses the contribution that oil funds can make to the policy challenges facing resource-rich countries. To set the stage, it reviews the potential role of such funds in the broader context of macroeconomic and energy policies – taking into account uncertainty about oil prices, the impact of institutional costs, and problems of organisational design. The paper then highlights the critical role of governance issues in three respects: defining transparently the goals of each fund; communicating these goals to build a constituency of public support; and ensuring the efficient and transparent management of the fund on an ongoing basis. Two recent cases in the Caspian Sea region are then discussed: Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan. In both instances, the paper highlights issues of coordination and efficiency in the investment policies of the funds. While there are attempts to monitor their transparency through public awareness and websites, the author believes that this in itself is no substitute for a comprehensive governance strategy. Moreover, improved transparency can help inform the debate about strategic issues concerning the goals for such funds, and their contribution to the country's development strategy. Comparative Economic Studies (2006) 48, 583–613. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ces.8100160

On the relationship between resource funds, governance and institutions: Evidence from quantile regression analysis

“…The study concludes that technical solutions such as the setting of resource funds will not work unless supportive constituencies will be developed in support of such measures. Kalyuzhnova (2006) examines the oil funds of Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan and concludes that the management and governance structures of the funds remain important for their "successful" performance. Tsalik (2003) incorporates the evidence from the funds of Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan into a wider set of oil funds.…”

Does transparency matter? Evaluating the governance impacts of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) in Azerbaijan and Liberia

“…Moreover, there is a communication gap between the EITI and the general public as the government has been unable to properly showcase how implementation of the initiative is benefitting the average citizen. As of 2006, the public hardly knew about the funds SOFAZ was expected to manage (Kalyuzhnova, 2006). Even civil society members of the MSG feel marginalized in an endeavour that is meant to bring them together with government and companies.…”

“…240 on 29 December 1999 by the Azeri President. SOFAZ is meant to govern the collection of oil revenue and bonuses and SOCAR is also authorized to ensure the transfer of funds into a special oil fund account in the National Bank of Azerbaijan (Kalyuzhnova, 2006).…”

State governance evolution in resource-rich transition economies: An application to Russia and Kazakhstan

“…Another common denominator is the importance of commodity production-in particular oil and gas. A number of articles of Kalyuzhnova (2006) and Kalyuzhnova and Kaser (2006) have examined the institutional structures for managing petroleum revenues in several of the Caspian Sea states. In particular, the channelling of revenue into ''stabilisation funds'' is intended to smooth future income projections (and hence government revenues/public spending) and enable industrial diversification (reduce commodities dependency).…”