L igand-targeted nanomedicines, particularly those directed to vascular-accessible biomarkers, 1,2 have evolved from fanciful concepts 25 years ago to product concepts now near or in clinical trials. While numerous chemical and biological barriers have been discovered and broached over this time frame, perhaps the single greatest challenge to success of nanomedicine technologies has been their inefficient access to extravascular constituents. In this issue of Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, Serrano et al delineates the unique and complex cell biology surrounding ICAM-1 mediated intracellular (and presumably) transcellular delivery of nanoparticles up to 4.5 ÎŒm, and illustrates a close mechanistic similarity to leukocyte endothelial transmigration.
see accompanying article on page 1178Many have touted the concept of enhanced permeability and retention as a mechanism for nanoparticle delivery into tumors and inflammatory sites through a purportedly leaky vasculature.3,4 Considerable research, particularly studies conducted in subcutaneous mouse tumor models, has demonstrated this effect over the last decade, but the magnitude of the extravascular delivery has depended on high intravascular overdosing of agents, prolonging particle systemic half-life (eg, pegylation), and decreasing particle size.5 Unfortunately, clinical hope for the enhanced permeability and retention effect has waned with recognition that this mechanism is severely curtailed in nonsubcutaneous tumor mouse models, larger mammalian preclinical models, and humans.In this paper, Daniel Serrano and Silvia Muro elucidate how nanomedicines can co-opt the ICAM-1 endothelial cell pathway for intravascular and, indirectly, transcellular delivery of nanoparticles. Unlike cell adhesion molecule (CAM) mediated endocytosis via clathrin or caveolae-associated vesicles, ICAM-1 based delivery does not associate with dynamin, a GTPase required for budding. 6 Likewise, the involvement of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase or phospholipase C, essential elements in macropinocytosis and phagocytosis, are not constituents of the ICAM-1 pathway, which requires protein kinase C.6 Although the formation of actin stress fibers through Src kinase and Rho-dependent kinase pathways is involved in ICAM-1 mediated transport, 6 development of actin cups or microtubules characteristic of macropinocytosis and phagocytosis is not observed. 7,8 While the ICAM-1 is associated with platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1, 6 the relationship differs from well-known clathrin-mediated uptake involving E-selectin, 9 P-selectin, 10 or vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 11 or from caveolae-associated turnover of thrombomodulin.
12Serrano et al show that ICAM-1 nanoparticle intracellular transport requires multivalent expression of targeting ligands, which enables rapid engulfment (ie, 15 minutes) of nanocarriers ranging from 180 nm to 4.5 îm. Multivalent ICAM-1 engagement interacts with amiloride sensitive Na/H exchange protein NHE1, 13 which functions as a cytoskeleton...