Guest editorial: Exploring inclusive publishing practices with early career disaster-studies researchers 1. Platforming early career researchers for more inclusive disaster studies Growing numbers of scholars are keen to study the causes of disasters and explore pathways to reduce disaster risk. As a result, there has been an influx of people with different academic backgrounds and fields of expertise who have entered the interdisciplinary field of disaster studies. For decades, disaster researchers have studied the barriers and drivers of disasters with the aim of transitioning to a safer future (Hewitt, 1983;Tierney, 2007). However, the field of disaster studies faces a number of major challenges linked to power, prestige and values. Recently, the questions of who develops research and how have become central to debates in disaster studies (Gaillard, 2019).Research impact and success are often measured on the basis of the perspectives and priorities of leading institutions in high-income countries. Yet, research informed by local realities and local knowledge potentially has a larger impact on both practice and scholarship. It is often difficult for individual researchers to make space for local perspectives due to their need to publish and attract funding. Therefore, research is rarely led by those who are actually vulnerable to disasters.A recent manifesto [1]signed by a large number of leading disaster researcherscalls for a radical rethinking of research agendas, methods and the allocation of resources, stressing the importance of advancing more inclusive approaches. This manifesto draws attention to fundamental flaws in the western research system, that underrepresents perspectives of people Guest editorial 1 Roughly two years in the making, the amount of hours and the number of people involved in this special issue is difficult to assess. We, as guest co-editors, met in December 2019 at a Winter School on Global Disaster Studies, which was hosted by COPE: Copenhagen Center for Disaster Research in the University of Copenhagen. Thanks to an initial invitation by JC Gaillard and Emmanuel Raju, the four of us took up the mantle and decided to engage in this colossal endeavour that meant organizing a special issue for DPM. We thus thank JC and Emmanuel for their constant help throughout this process, as they have been closely involved from the start. We also thank Emerald for their support and for allowing us to tweak some formalities of traditional scientific publishing.