2018
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.6568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overall survival based on oncologist density in the United States: Do we need to redefine underserved areas for oncologic care?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, the notion of health professional shortage areas has been defined to account for many facets of health care access based on location, but it has been shown to be an imperfect measure for oncologic access. 58,59 Moreover, no studies examined health professional shortage areas and the methods used to determine or classify rurality were largely inconsistent across studies, including rural-urban continuum codes, 34,41,46 ruralurban commuting area codes, 36 various rurality indices unique to the area being studied, 38,51 self-stratification based purely on population of individual areas, 45 and some studies with unclear classification. 35,43 There is substantial overlap between ruralurban continuum codes and rural-urban commuting area, and both have been used in studying disparities in cancer treatment access and differential mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this regard, the notion of health professional shortage areas has been defined to account for many facets of health care access based on location, but it has been shown to be an imperfect measure for oncologic access. 58,59 Moreover, no studies examined health professional shortage areas and the methods used to determine or classify rurality were largely inconsistent across studies, including rural-urban continuum codes, 34,41,46 ruralurban commuting area codes, 36 various rurality indices unique to the area being studied, 38,51 self-stratification based purely on population of individual areas, 45 and some studies with unclear classification. 35,43 There is substantial overlap between ruralurban continuum codes and rural-urban commuting area, and both have been used in studying disparities in cancer treatment access and differential mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, rurality status is an imperfect proxy because that status often reflects additional socioeconomic factors relevant to appropriate oncologic access beyond purely distance traveled. In this regard, the notion of health professional shortage areas has been defined to account for many facets of health care access based on location, but it has been shown to be an imperfect measure for oncologic access 58,59. Moreover, no studies examined health professional shortage areas and the methods used to determine or classify rurality were largely inconsistent across studies, including rural-urban continuum codes,34,41,46 rural-urban commuting area codes,36 various rurality indices unique to the area being studied,38,51 self-stratification based purely on population of individual areas,45 and some studies with unclear classification 35,43.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%