2013
DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrt082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overall response of both intrahepatic tumor and portal vein tumor thrombosis is a good prognostic factor for hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy

Abstract: This study investigated the prognostic significance of portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) response in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with localized concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). We retrospectively analyzed 100 patients treated with CCRT for UICC Stage T2–4N0M0 HCC with PVTT between 2002 and 2011. The radiotherapy (RT) volume included both primary tumor and PVTT, and the median radiation dose was 45 Gy. Treatment response was evaluated for up to 6 months after RT. With respect to PVTT r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(19 reference statements)
4
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although radiotherapy (RT) is not recognized as the standard of care because of lack of controlled phase III trials, numerous studies have demonstrated that RT not only causes tumour responses but also provides prolonged survival in this group. Significant responses after RT in patients with HCC and PVTT have been reported, and the objective response rate of PVTT was 39–62% . In several reports, the RT responder group showed significantly longer survival than the non‐responders , and the response to RT was an independent prognostic factor associated with better survival in multivariate analysis .…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although radiotherapy (RT) is not recognized as the standard of care because of lack of controlled phase III trials, numerous studies have demonstrated that RT not only causes tumour responses but also provides prolonged survival in this group. Significant responses after RT in patients with HCC and PVTT have been reported, and the objective response rate of PVTT was 39–62% . In several reports, the RT responder group showed significantly longer survival than the non‐responders , and the response to RT was an independent prognostic factor associated with better survival in multivariate analysis .…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Notably, the sensitive effect was less evident in HepG2 cells under 4 or 6 Gy radiation. These could be explained by the different radiosensitivities of different cells and by the different cellular uptake rates of AuNPs on different cells (48.5% for B16, 28.9% for HepG2 at 24 h) (4,29,39). Previous studies on cell viability were mostly carried out with X-ray dose constant or changed without a gradation (38).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, PVTT is sensitive to RT, and the response rate ranges from 25% to 61.5% [52,[55][56][57][58]. Furthermore, RT can boost the treatment responses of tumors and PVTT, and thus likely bestows a survival benefit [33,52,[59][60][61][62]. In one retrospective study, preoperative RT induced PVTT necrosis in 8 patients (53.3%), and preoperative RT followed by surgery resulted in better outcomes than surgery alone for HCC with PVTT (5-year survival rate: 34.8% vs. 13.1%, p=0.0359) [61].…”
Section: Concurrent Chemoradiation With Hepatic Arterial Infusion In mentioning
confidence: 99%