2020
DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1737349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overall indexes of coordination in front crawl swimming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the stroking, kicking, and breathing features were integrated with the stroke cycle duration (Table 1 and Figure 4), allowing a reliable combined timing analysis of the action of all principal factors in front-crawl using the minimum number of inertial sensors. Swimming is a cyclic activity, and the synchronization between the head and upper/lower arms can only be optimal if it can be maintained along consecutive stroke cycles [23]. In order to produce the propelling effects, the stroking, kicking, and breathing must occur at the same relative time in each stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the stroking, kicking, and breathing features were integrated with the stroke cycle duration (Table 1 and Figure 4), allowing a reliable combined timing analysis of the action of all principal factors in front-crawl using the minimum number of inertial sensors. Swimming is a cyclic activity, and the synchronization between the head and upper/lower arms can only be optimal if it can be maintained along consecutive stroke cycles [23]. In order to produce the propelling effects, the stroking, kicking, and breathing must occur at the same relative time in each stroke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its key role within the stroke, the entry event is the most critical instant to be detected by IMU, probably due to high variation related to the swimmer specialization [20,21]. From temporal-phase parameters, together with position and velocity of body segments, previous studies investigated start/end propulsion of one arm with respect to the other (coordination index) [17], the interlimb coordination (continuous relative phase) [22], and synchronization [23]. The adaptive role of movement and coordination variability were assessed by using these motor control indexes, highlighting how behavior functionally responds to environmental and task constraints [4,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Também era esperada a diferença entre os grupos competitivo e recreativo para ambas as condições, no entanto houve uma interação significativa entre estes fatores indicando que o acréscimo de velocidade pela inclusão das ações de membros superiores foi mais relevante para o grupo nacional. Este resultado pode ser devido a maior habilidade dos nadadores mais treinados em coordenar às ações de braços e pernas e se aproveitar da melhor maneira possível da interação entre elas (MEZÊNCIO et al, 2020). (ZAMPARO et al, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Primeiramente, como mencionado anteriormente, nadadores mais habilidosos são capazes de sincronizar suas ações de pernas e braços de forma a produzir maior eficiência das ações propulsivas, o que consequentemente, reduziria a participação de membros inferiores apenas na potência total produzida (MEZÊNCIO et al, 2020). Além disso, a pernada não possui apenas finalidade propulsiva no nado crawl, mas também tem grande importância na estabilidade do corpo durante o nado (NAKASHIMA, 2007;YANAI, 2001;ZAMPARO et al, 1996), desta forma a maior contribuição de membros inferiores para o grupo de menor desempenho pode ser relacionada a uma maior necessidade de estabilização devido a uma técnica menos eficiente.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Data processing was performed in Matlab (MATLAB R2019b, The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA), and intrinsic camera parameters had been previously calculated to correct distortions. The initial extrinsic parameters were obtained using a six marker rectangular rigid calibration body (2.0 × 1.0 m), with markers placed horizontally at 0, 1.0 and 2.0 m and vertically at 0 and 1.0 m [ 2 , 19 ]. The six markers with known coordinates were digitized, and the DLT method was applied for reconstruction [ 19 ], with a final reconstruction error < 1.43 mm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%