2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12671-022-01970-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overall and Differential Attrition in Mindfulness-Based Interventions: a Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, in Study 1, the attrition rate of the intervention group was higher than that of the control group. This aligns with findings from a previous meta-analysis, which reported that MBIs resulted in slightly higher attrition rates compared to control conditions in sensitivity analyses ( Lam et al., 2022 ). In Study 2, we addressed this issue by putting more effort into contacting participants to complete the questionnaires.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Third, in Study 1, the attrition rate of the intervention group was higher than that of the control group. This aligns with findings from a previous meta-analysis, which reported that MBIs resulted in slightly higher attrition rates compared to control conditions in sensitivity analyses ( Lam et al., 2022 ). In Study 2, we addressed this issue by putting more effort into contacting participants to complete the questionnaires.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Attrition rates in previous mindfulness training trials with LEOs have been variable, ranging from 7% attrition at 5-month follow up [ 74 ] to up to 41% at the end of the 8-week intervention [ 78 ]. In a recent meta-analysis [ 129 ], authors identified a 19% attrition rate (operationalized as loss to follow-up at post-test) across 114 mindfulness training RCTs, which is slightly above the 16% attrition in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…We calculated a median of 23.4%. Prior work has reported attrition rates from 50% to 60% for research on electronic health care delivered via the internet [ 78 ] and an average attrition rate of 43.4% in mobile health interventions delivered via smartphones [ 79 ] (for face-to-face mindfulness interventions, attrition rates are approximately 19.1% on average [ 80 ]). This higher maximum and lower average rates partly confirm our second hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Context factors also need to be considered in this case as differential attrition for the most investigated app, Headspace, concerned both the intervention and control groups in different studies. Attrition is a problem for intervention research overall, but differential attrition seems to be less of a problem for common, non–mobile-based mindfulness interventions [ 80 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%