2009
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjp114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overall and anterior Bolton ratio in Class I, II, and III orthodontic patients

Abstract: The aim of the investigation was to compare overall and anterior Bolton ratios in different malocclusion groups with Bolton's standards. The material comprised 600 pre-treatment study casts (262 males and 338 females, aged 12-25 years), selected from the models of 3088 patients who had applied for orthodontic treatment based on the following criteria: permanent dentition from the first right molar to the first left molar and no interproximal caries or restorations. There were 162 Class I, 144 Class II division… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

14
27
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
14
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, other studies have observed significant differences in the presence of tooth size discrepancies among malocclusion groups. 10,11,12,13 Wedrychowska-Szulc et al 14 compared tooth size ratios in 600 study casts of patients with different malocclusion groups (Class I, Class II division 1, Class II division 2, and Class III) and found statistically significant differences in the overall ratio among all groups and in the mean ratio in the anterior region between Class I and Class III groups. Araujo and Souki 10 assessed the association between tooth size discrepancy in the anterior region and Class I, II, and III Angle malocclusions in 300 Brazilian patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other studies have observed significant differences in the presence of tooth size discrepancies among malocclusion groups. 10,11,12,13 Wedrychowska-Szulc et al 14 compared tooth size ratios in 600 study casts of patients with different malocclusion groups (Class I, Class II division 1, Class II division 2, and Class III) and found statistically significant differences in the overall ratio among all groups and in the mean ratio in the anterior region between Class I and Class III groups. Araujo and Souki 10 assessed the association between tooth size discrepancy in the anterior region and Class I, II, and III Angle malocclusions in 300 Brazilian patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were no significant systematic errors, and the random errors of the mesiodistal diameters of each tooth were within acceptable limits 14,15 , ranging from 0.10 (canines) to 0.31 mm (molars).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Some researchers have concluded that interarch relationships are correlated with sex, ethnicity, and type of malocclusion, [15][16][17]29 whereas others refute such findings. 20 Moreover, the Bolton indexes are essentially means with wide ranges of values (anterior, 74.5-80.4; overall, 87.5-94.8), indicating great interindividual variability in what is considered normal occlusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%