2022
DOI: 10.1186/s13071-022-05152-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Over-dispersed Trypanosoma cruzi parasite load in sylvatic and domestic mammals and humans from northeastern Argentina

Abstract: Background The distribution of parasite load across hosts may modify the transmission dynamics of infectious diseases. Chagas disease is caused by a multi-host protozoan, Trypanosoma cruzi, but the association between host parasitemia and infectiousness to the vector has not been studied in sylvatic mammalian hosts. We quantified T. cruzi parasite load in sylvatic mammals, modeled the association of the parasite load with infectiousness to the vector and compared these results with previous one… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(103 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modelling showed that Panstrongylus species richness overlapped with high Dasypus/Didelphis (potential blood source for this vector) areas, all coinciding with CD cases (latest 2014). This scenario of overlap would be a potential risk factor for an increase in the incidence of this anthroponotic disease ( Figure 3 C,D) [ 11 , 72 , 73 , 74 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modelling showed that Panstrongylus species richness overlapped with high Dasypus/Didelphis (potential blood source for this vector) areas, all coinciding with CD cases (latest 2014). This scenario of overlap would be a potential risk factor for an increase in the incidence of this anthroponotic disease ( Figure 3 C,D) [ 11 , 72 , 73 , 74 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is my view that estimates like the ones discussed here, and especially those presented in Fig 1 , are far more informative than measures of bloodstream parasite availability that disregard imperfect (<100%) test sensitivity or measures of test sensitivity that disregard imperfect (<100%) parasite availability [ 1 ]. The former are often presented as estimates of the “infectiousness” of pathogen-carrying hosts to blood-feeding vectors (e.g., [ 13 ]), and the latter as estimates of the “clinical sensitivity” of diagnostic procedures (cf. [ 14 ]); as a rule, a formal assessment of how test sensitivity affects measures of “infectiousness”, and of how pathogen availability affects measures of “clinical sensitivity”, is lacking in these kinds of studies.…”
Section: Caveats and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%