Over de kloof tussen wetenschap en praktijk

Uden, C.J.T. van

doi:10.1007/s12491-009-0007-6

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The conclusions to be drawn from those figures is that citizens want things to be done for them instead of participating in what they often see as boring It also implies that the problem of the gap is interesting for intellectuals and scholars in political science who remember the massive participative procedures of the 1960s and 1970s, but not for ordinary people, or for practitioners. Of course, the former may have convincing fundamental, moral and philosophical arguments to underline the necessity of at least a balance between direct and indirect democracy (Jolles, 1974;Norris, 1999;OECD 2001;Aarts & Castenmiller, 1991;Van Kersbergen & Propper, 1995;Van Gunsteren & Andeweg, 1994;Simonis et al, 1991;ROB, 2000). However, it seems that these arguments have not been very convincing for the world outside local government.…”

Section: Structural Asymmetries In Dutch Local Policy Network 235mentioning

confidence: 99%

Stability despite Reforms: Structural Asymmetries in Dutch Local Policy Networks

Vries

2008

Local Government Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article addresses the development of local policy networks in the Netherlands in the period 1996-2005. It is argued that there is a surprising stability in such networks seen from the perspective of local policymakers. Those working inside city hall as politicians and as members of the local administration remain the core members of the inner circle in policy networks, while societal groups remain outsiders and political party groups are absent from local policy networks. This conclusion is based on three identical standardised surveys among local politicians and top administrators at the local level, which were conducted in 1996, 2000 and 2005. This outcome is surprising, because it is contrary to the high expectations arising from numerous institutional reforms taking place in this period, aimed, among other things, at diminishing the gap between citizens and policymakers; the numerous experiments in co-production, public-private partnerships, and interactive policy processes; and the widespread documentation and dissemination of the outcomes of such experiments. Possible explanations for the results are that the experiments, however successful they might have been, never had a structural follow-up, and that the structural reforms, no matter what they accomplished otherwise, did not achieve their goal in enhancing interactive policymaking because they overlooked the fact that local policymakers see the local political system as a representative democracy and not as a direct or participatory one. On that basis it is to be expected that support for policies by policymakers is mainly sought among influential actors who are elected or appointed to develop policies and whose interests have to be taken into account. The public and societal groups do not satisfy that criterion. They can and do seek support from policymakers but the latter are hardly inclined to seek support from them.

show abstract

Section: Structural Asymmetries In Dutch Local Policy Network 235mentioning

confidence: 99%

Stability despite Reforms: Structural Asymmetries in Dutch Local Policy Networks

Vries

2008

Local Government Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Over de kloof tussen wetenschap en praktijk

Cited by 1 publication

References 3 publications

Stability despite Reforms: Structural Asymmetries in Dutch Local Policy Networks

Stability despite Reforms: Structural Asymmetries in Dutch Local Policy Networks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About