1973
DOI: 10.3758/bf03326923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ovarian activity of female ring doves (Streptopelia risoria) exposed to marginal stimuli from males

Abstract: Although previous studies have indicated that male displays promote ovulation in the female ring dove, it was unknown whether perception of the male's structural features was an essential prerequisite for the response. In the present study, females were exposed to the shadow of a courting male or to his vocalization alone. Vocalization itself was ineffective in inducing ovulation, but half of the females provided with the additional visual stimulus laid eggs. It is suggested that perception of the feather and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second part of the hypothesis, i.e., the female must recognize that the male's behavior is contingent upon her own for maximal ovarian development, is new and is currently under test in this laboratory. Contrary to various previous proposals (Lambe & Erickson, 1973;Lorenz, 1950), this hypothesis implies that the female's brain is not just a passive accumulator of redundant feature-detection events during courtship but that it must detect stimuli from the male that are contingent upon her own efferent activity. The female is more than a mere passive recipient of male-originated auditory and visual stimuli and does not have maximum ovarian development unless she is an active partner in courtship activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The second part of the hypothesis, i.e., the female must recognize that the male's behavior is contingent upon her own for maximal ovarian development, is new and is currently under test in this laboratory. Contrary to various previous proposals (Lambe & Erickson, 1973;Lorenz, 1950), this hypothesis implies that the female's brain is not just a passive accumulator of redundant feature-detection events during courtship but that it must detect stimuli from the male that are contingent upon her own efferent activity. The female is more than a mere passive recipient of male-originated auditory and visual stimuli and does not have maximum ovarian development unless she is an active partner in courtship activities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Event record "A" (below) shows the sixth food presentation of that session as well as the target responses and changes in the position of the pictorial image that followed that presentation. Looney and Cohen, 1974), this inexpensive, randomaccess projector would be valuable for studying pictorial control of other behaviors such as operant responding (eg., Butler and Woolpy, 1963;Thompson, 1964), sign-tracking, imprinted responses, and reproductive behavior (Lambe and Erickson, 1973 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%