2018
DOI: 10.4337/9781785365027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outsourcing the Law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Basically, he argued that the high standard of proof of the prevention principle was used instead of the lower standard of proof of the precautionary principle; Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay), Judgment (Separate Opinion Judge Greenwood), ICJ Reports 2010, p. 221; see also Boyle and Harrison (2013), p. 269. 60 See Westerman (2018); for an earlier analysis in Dutch see Westerman (2008).…”
Section: Obligations Of Conduct and Result: A Regulatory Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Basically, he argued that the high standard of proof of the prevention principle was used instead of the lower standard of proof of the precautionary principle; Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. Uruguay), Judgment (Separate Opinion Judge Greenwood), ICJ Reports 2010, p. 221; see also Boyle and Harrison (2013), p. 269. 60 See Westerman (2018); for an earlier analysis in Dutch see Westerman (2008).…”
Section: Obligations Of Conduct and Result: A Regulatory Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the precautionary principle does not refer to any concrete and specific measures that need to be taken, so in that regard the state has discretion when it comes to implementation. What is clear from the due diligence obligation is that a state needs to take precautionary 68 Westerman (2008), p. 51;Westerman (2018), pp. 2-3.…”
Section: Obligations Of Conduct and Result: A Regulatory Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations