1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02249427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outreach to homeless mentally ill people: Conceptual and clinical considerations

Abstract: This paper describes a model of outreach predicated on developing a trusting, meaningful relationship between the outreach worker and the homeless person with mental illness. We describe five common tasks inherent in this model of outreach (establishing contact and credibility, identifying people with mental illness, engaging clients, conducting assessments and treatment planning, and providing ongoing service). Other issues discussed include: (a) Responding to dependency needs and promoting autonomy; (b) sett… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
42
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, this literature fails to adequately account for dynamics of mental illness or homelessness. At the same time, the literature on outreach to homelessness (Kuhlman, 1994;Levy, 2000;Morse, 1996;Susser et al, 1990;Whittacker and MacLeod, 1998) fails to account for the "wildcard" of interconnection between substance use and psychiatric problems among people with HIV/AIDS (Cunningham, 2005;Zwebem and Denning, 1998). Levy (2000) delineates five principles of outreach to homeless people: 1) promote safety; 2) relationship formation; 3) develop common language; 4) promote and support change; 5) cultural and ecological effects.…”
Section: Outreachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, this literature fails to adequately account for dynamics of mental illness or homelessness. At the same time, the literature on outreach to homelessness (Kuhlman, 1994;Levy, 2000;Morse, 1996;Susser et al, 1990;Whittacker and MacLeod, 1998) fails to account for the "wildcard" of interconnection between substance use and psychiatric problems among people with HIV/AIDS (Cunningham, 2005;Zwebem and Denning, 1998). Levy (2000) delineates five principles of outreach to homeless people: 1) promote safety; 2) relationship formation; 3) develop common language; 4) promote and support change; 5) cultural and ecological effects.…”
Section: Outreachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Outreach" in this model refers to care that is provided in non-traditional settings frequented by, or convenient to, homeless persons, in the absence of which such individuals would be unlikely to access services (Morse et al 1996). The care may be delivered at schools (Berti et al 2001;Nabors et al 2004), in community drop-in centres (Cunnane et al 1995;Reuler 1991) or in transitional housing settings (Rog et al 1995), but the most common location is at homeless shelters.…”
Section: Fixed Outreach Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selon Morse et al (1996), l'outreach peut être défini comme « des travailleurs qui contactent les individus itinérants atteints de troubles mentaux dans un environnement non traditionnel dans le but d'amélio-rer leur santé mentale ou physique, leur fonctionnement social ou leur utilisation des services et des ressources humaines ». Cette définition inclut les tâches suivantes : l'établissement d'un contact et d'une crédi-bilité, l'identification des personnes atteintes de troubles mentaux, l'engagement, la planification et l'évaluation d'un traitement, et la dispensation des services courants.…”
Section: Outreachunclassified
“…Les recherches ont démontré que ce modèle peut être efficace seulement dans une communauté où il y a des ressources adéquates pour cette population et que la construction de la relation semble être le facteur le plus significatif pour préparer les clients à accepter les services (Billig et Levinson, 1987). D'autre part, une équipe de St-Louis (Morse et al, 1996) a démontré que les programmes de suivi intensif obtiennent de meilleurs résultats que ceux de gestion de cas pour plusieurs variables : nombre de contacts avec les services de traitement, utilisation des ressources, gravité des troubles de la pensée, niveau d'activité et satisfaction du client. Rog et al (1987) estiment que la gestion intensive de cas, qui laisse une plus grande place à la pratique d'outreach et à la protection des droits de l'itinérant, semble être l'approche la plus efficace.…”
Section: Gestion De Casunclassified