Output regulation for a class of switched stochastic delay systems based on dissipativity

Li, Lili; Jin, Cui-Li; Ge, Xin

doi:10.1109/cac.2017.8243267

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Example Consider the tunnel diode circuit used in [36], see [37] for its specific modeling process. Take

C = 100 m F, L = 20 H, R_{L} = 2 k normalΩ

and

R_{E} = 0.2 k normalΩ

, then matrix parameters are

\begin{matrix} A_{11} = & ([], \begin{matrix} center center \\ array - 10.025 & array 10 \\ array 0.025 & array - 10 \end{matrix}), A_{21} = ([], \begin{matrix} center center \\ array 0.1 & array 0 \\ array 0 & array 3 \end{matrix}), B_{1} = ([], \begin{matrix} center center \\ array 0 \\ array 0.05 \end{matrix}), \\ A_{12} = & ([], \begin{matrix} center center \\ array - 0.025 & array 10 \\ array 0.025 & array - 10 \end{matrix}), A_{22} = ([], \begin{matrix} center center \\ array 0.1 & array 0 \\ array 0 & array 3 \end{matrix}), B_{2} = ([], \begin{matrix} center center \\ array 0 \\ array 0.05 \end{matrix}), \end{matrix}

where

σ \in false{1,2 false}

.…”

Section: Simulation Examplementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Event‐triggered control for switched delay systems with dynamic input quantization

Wang

et al. 2022

Asian Journal of Control

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary This paper is concerned with event‐triggered control for the switched system with time‐varying delay and dynamic input quantization. The work is aimed at solving the quantizer saturation in the finite‐level quantized control design and the mismatch caused by event‐triggered sampling and the switching. First of all, the quantization parameter updating laws are designed respectively in the case of match and mismatch between the system and the controller under the event‐triggered mechanism without Zeno behavior. Then, the total variation of Lyapunov functional is transformed into discrete time updating of the dynamic quantization parameter. A switching law and a quantized control strategy are developed to ensure the exponential stability of switched systems with delay and input quantization. At last, two examples are given to illustrate the validity of the results.

show abstract

“…Example Consider the tunnel diode circuit used in [36], see [37] for its specific modeling process. Take

C = 100 m F, L = 20 H, R_{L} = 2 k normalΩ

and

R_{E} = 0.2 k normalΩ

, then matrix parameters are

\begin{matrix} A_{11} = & ([], \begin{matrix} center center \\ array - 10.025 & array 10 \\ array 0.025 & array - 10 \end{matrix}), A_{21} = ([], \begin{matrix} center center \\ array 0.1 & array 0 \\ array 0 & array 3 \end{matrix}), B_{1} = ([], \begin{matrix} center center \\ array 0 \\ array 0.05 \end{matrix}), \\ A_{12} = & ([], \begin{matrix} center center \\ array - 0.025 & array 10 \\ array 0.025 & array - 10 \end{matrix}), A_{22} = ([], \begin{matrix} center center \\ array 0.1 & array 0 \\ array 0 & array 3 \end{matrix}), B_{2} = ([], \begin{matrix} center center \\ array 0 \\ array 0.05 \end{matrix}), \end{matrix}

where

σ \in false{1,2 false}

.…”

Section: Simulation Examplementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Example 2. Consider the tunnel diode circuit used in [36], see [37] for its specific modeling process. Take C = 100mF, L = 20H, R L = 2kΩ and R E = 0.2kΩ, then matrix parameters are and one can calculate T * = 0.0209.…”

Section: Simulation Examplementioning

confidence: 99%

Event‐triggered control for switched delay systems with dynamic input quantization

Wang

et al. 2022

Asian Journal of Control

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Output regulation for a class of switched stochastic delay systems based on dissipativity

Cited by 1 publication

References 21 publications

Event‐triggered control for switched delay systems with dynamic input quantization

Event‐triggered control for switched delay systems with dynamic input quantization

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About