2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2092536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Output Gaps and Robust Monetary Policy Rules

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(13 reference statements)
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taylor and Williams (2010) also find that, absent a lower bound on the policy rate, policies that respond to the change in the output gap tend to be close to optimal -a finding also suggested in, for example, Blake (2012). Billi (2011) raise questions about the efficacy of responding the change in the output gap once the analysis acknowledges the zero-lower bound -a concern that our analysis suggests is quantitatively very important.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Taylor and Williams (2010) also find that, absent a lower bound on the policy rate, policies that respond to the change in the output gap tend to be close to optimal -a finding also suggested in, for example, Blake (2012). Billi (2011) raise questions about the efficacy of responding the change in the output gap once the analysis acknowledges the zero-lower bound -a concern that our analysis suggests is quantitatively very important.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…One reason for the poor performance of the estimated rule is its sizable response to the change in the output gap; such a response implies that accommodation is removed as soon as a recovery begins (rather than waiting until the level of activity has recovered)-a response that short-circuits a recovery as emphasized by Billi (2011).…”
Section: Economic Performance Under Traditional Approaches Iiiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of the parameters α, β, and σ are derived from Billi (2011) and correspond to those of Woodford (2003) for U.S. data with the nowadays conventional exception that the value of 1/σ represents a lower degree of interest-sensitivity of aggregate expenditure than originally employed by Woodford. The value of the quarterly discount factor (β = 0.99) implies that the steady state real interest rate is 4% annually.…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%