2020
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2020.0107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Output feedback robust stabilisation for uncertain non‐linear systems with dead‐zone input

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, it can be assumed that the control applied to the proportional valve is directly proportional to the spool position, i.e., x v = k i u, where k i is a positive electrical constant and u is the control input voltage. Therefore, Equations (16) and (17) can be transformed to…”
Section: Flow Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, it can be assumed that the control applied to the proportional valve is directly proportional to the spool position, i.e., x v = k i u, where k i is a positive electrical constant and u is the control input voltage. Therefore, Equations (16) and (17) can be transformed to…”
Section: Flow Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As pointed out in [14], there are generally two kinds of methods to alleviate the effects of deadzone in the literature. One is to model the deadzone as a combination of a linear control input with a constant/time-varying gain (for symmetric/asymmetric deadzone, respectively) and a bounded disturbance-like term, examples like in [15][16][17][18]. In these control algorithms, the disturbance-like term was lumped into uncertain nonlinearities and suppressed by various robust feedback terms, which was likely to arise reduced control performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 3. Supposing that the linear forward part of Lurie system (28) has no eigenvalues on the imaginary axis except for m eigenvalues at the origin, and p open-loop poles with positive real parts at the same time, then the necessary and sufficient condition for the stability of original system could be summarized as follows: (1) the first condition in Theorem 2 must be satisfied; (2) p = 2N, where N is the circles of Nyquist diagram of G(jω) around the point (−1, j0).…”
Section: Extended Circle Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The turntable servo system often fails to achieve accurate tracking due to nonlinear disturbance factors such as friction [22][23][24][25][26], backlash [27], dead-zone [28], and motor torque fluctuation [29], etc. Friction is a common non-linear phenomenon, which exists in almost all electromechanical servo system between two contact surfaces with relative motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are abundant results related to the stabilization of various dynamical models like linear systems (Brockett and Liberzon, 2000), non-linear systems (Mirzaei et al, 2021), and networked systems (Liu et al, 2021). Meanwhile, different control methods, such as output feedback (Jia et al, 2020) and event-triggered strategies (Peng and Ai, 2019), have also been proposed to implement the stabilization of dynamical systems. In order to achieve the modeling and analysis of algebraic systems, Cheng et al (2010) proposed a semi-tensor product (STP) of matrix, on the basis of which studies on Boolean networks and other algebraic systems have been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%