Output feedback H _∞/GH ₂ preview control of active vehicle suspensions: a comparison study of LQG preview

Approach to imitate maneuvering of lunar roving vehicle under lunar gravity using a terrestrial vehicle

“…For a semi-active vehicle suspension, H 1 control of the vehicle suspension with a magneto-rheological (MR) damper was used to significantly attenuate the lateral, yaw, and roll accelerations of the car body [8][9][10]. For an active vehicle suspension, the H 1 controller was used to improve the vehicle suspension performance (including ride comfort, road holding, and suspension deflection) [11][12][13], and other research considered the problem of using robust H 1 control for a half-vehicle active suspension system with input delay [14][15][16]. The H 1 control method was also used to improve the driving safety and steering http performance for the steering model of a vehicle (including the steering flexibility, feeling of side slipping, and deviation of the vehicle from the planned path) [17,18].…”

Active Adaptive Estimation and Control for Vehicle Suspensions With Prescribed Performance

“…An H ∞ control [17] was used for active suspension systems. A Linear Quadratic Gaussian (LQG) control was also considered in [18]. Although these optimal control or robust control schemes can address the control constraints, the system dynamics studied in aforementioned results are assumed to be linear.…”

Design of Robust Digital Pole Placer for Car Active Suspension with Input Constraint

“…Adaptive sliding-mode control for active suspensions using fuzzy approach is shown in [13]. In [14], a linear-quadratic-Gaussian (LQG) control is used to obtain a trade-off between the conflicting suspension requirements.…”