Near Surface Geoscience 2015 - 21st European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 2015
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201413745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outpost Method of Computing Leaking and Normal Modes for Elastic Multilayered Half-space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For models typically with high Poisson's ratios such as that shown in Table 1, leaky waves may show significant energy on the seismogram recorded at proper distances [Roth et al 1998, Gao et al 2014. Dispersion analysis in terms of mode theory would then afford complementary information for seismic surveying, especially for inverting the P-wave velocity structure [Oliver 1964, Su and Dorman 1965, Znak and Kashtan 2015 due to it being better sensed by leaky modes than by shear normal modes. Therefore, accurate computation of leaky modes is necessary, as done here, for it may also have great implications for high-resolution seismic surveying and full waveform inversions [Roth et al 1998].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For models typically with high Poisson's ratios such as that shown in Table 1, leaky waves may show significant energy on the seismogram recorded at proper distances [Roth et al 1998, Gao et al 2014. Dispersion analysis in terms of mode theory would then afford complementary information for seismic surveying, especially for inverting the P-wave velocity structure [Oliver 1964, Su and Dorman 1965, Znak and Kashtan 2015 due to it being better sensed by leaky modes than by shear normal modes. Therefore, accurate computation of leaky modes is necessary, as done here, for it may also have great implications for high-resolution seismic surveying and full waveform inversions [Roth et al 1998].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%