2017
DOI: 10.14444/4003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outpatient Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: An Analysis of Readmissions from the New Jersey State Ambulatory Services Database

Abstract: Background Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) performed as an outpatient has become increasingly common for treating cervical spine pathology. Few reports have attempted to assess readmissions following outpatient ACDF. This study was performed to address this issue using population-based databases. Methods The State Ambulatory Services Database (SASD) for New Jersey (NJ) from 2003-2012 was used for analysis. Patients receiving ACDF (defined as anterior cervical fusion (ICD-0 code=81.02) + excision… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is not surprising, given that age is a known risk factor for peri-complications in spine surgery 25,33 and the presence of comorbidities may increase the risk anesthetic or other perioperative complications, and thus these patients are likely to be selected for inpatient procedures to allow for prolonged monitoring. Although these studies included 1- and 2- level cases in contrast to our study, which included 2- and 3- level cases, the findings of our study are consistent with the results reported by McGirt et al, 30 Fu et al, 31 and McClelland et al, 23,32 which showed that ACDF can be safely performed in the outpatient setting, with no increase in complication rates in appropriately selected patients. In contrast, Arshi et al 25 found a greater risk of perioperative complications, including the need for revision surgeries, as well as a higher risk of postoperative acute renal failure in the outpatient setting; the reason for this concerning finding is unclear.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding is not surprising, given that age is a known risk factor for peri-complications in spine surgery 25,33 and the presence of comorbidities may increase the risk anesthetic or other perioperative complications, and thus these patients are likely to be selected for inpatient procedures to allow for prolonged monitoring. Although these studies included 1- and 2- level cases in contrast to our study, which included 2- and 3- level cases, the findings of our study are consistent with the results reported by McGirt et al, 30 Fu et al, 31 and McClelland et al, 23,32 which showed that ACDF can be safely performed in the outpatient setting, with no increase in complication rates in appropriately selected patients. In contrast, Arshi et al 25 found a greater risk of perioperative complications, including the need for revision surgeries, as well as a higher risk of postoperative acute renal failure in the outpatient setting; the reason for this concerning finding is unclear.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The few studies that include outpatient multilevel fusions also include 1-level fusions, which account for a majority of the study population. 3,23 -32…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the cost of healthcare has been rising rapidly within the United States, an attempt is being made to perform an increasing proportion of spine surgery procedures in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). ASCs are more efficient than large hospitals, both economically and functionally, with reports of high rates of safety, economic efficiency, and patient satisfaction for outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] posterior cervical foraminotomy, 15,16 cervical total disc replacement, 17,18 posterior lumbar laminectomy or discectomy, [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] posterior lumbar fusion (minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fu-sion), 26,27 and lumbar direct lateral interbody fusions. 28,29 There has been uncertainty regarding the safety of performing anterior lumbar procedures requiring vascular access, as to date little has been published on this subset of patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surgical approach for anterior cervical spinal fusion itself involves little disruption of local musculatures or other systemic intervention. Although general anesthesia and hospitalization is usually required for patients who undergo ACDF surgery, efforts have been made by experts in spine care to expedite the treatment algorithm and reduce the length of stay needed for ACDF [15,16]. In the United States, many ACDF operations are performed in ambulatory care settings, and patients can go home the same day after surgery [11,17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%