1966
DOI: 10.1190/1.1439805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outlining of Shale Masses by Geophysical Methods

Abstract: Shale masses are here defined as large bodies of shale at least several hundred feet in thickness. These may be formed either as diapiric masses or as depositional masses. The shale masses are like salt masses and the two are many times combined to form domal masses; they both may form the updip seal for stratigraphic accumulation of oil. The shale masses exhibit the following properties by comparison to the normal section: (1) low velocities—in the range of 6,500 to 8,500 ft/sec with very little increase of v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of mobile shale was formed in the 1960s (Musgrave and Hicks, 1966) and has been cited as a common interpretation where thick sequences of mudrocks exist through to recent times (Morley, 2003). If shale is unable to flow, i.e., deforming by brittle failure instead of a plastic flow, and is unable to effectively fill the shape of the void created, strain compatibility problems may occur within the core of detachment folds where the redistribution of relatively incompetent material occurs.…”
Section: Reinterpretation Of Mobile Shale In the South Niger Deltamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of mobile shale was formed in the 1960s (Musgrave and Hicks, 1966) and has been cited as a common interpretation where thick sequences of mudrocks exist through to recent times (Morley, 2003). If shale is unable to flow, i.e., deforming by brittle failure instead of a plastic flow, and is unable to effectively fill the shape of the void created, strain compatibility problems may occur within the core of detachment folds where the redistribution of relatively incompetent material occurs.…”
Section: Reinterpretation Of Mobile Shale In the South Niger Deltamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, chaotic seismic facies in the subsurface of many continental margins are often interpreted as 'mud' or 'shale diapirs' due to their resemblance to salt diapirs (e.g. Musgrave & Hicks, 1968;Lancelot & Embley, 1977;Morley & Guerin, 1996;Morley, 2003;L eon et al, 2010). In these studies, the terms 'mud diapir', 'clay diapir', 'shale diapir' and 'mudstone diapir' have been used somewhat interchangeably (Milkov, 2000;Wood, 2010; e.g.…”
Section: Mud Diapirs Versus Shale Diapirsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in certain instances it may be possible to draw reliable inferences about fluid pressure indirectly. The tendency of certain overpressured shales to flow [Musgrave and Hicks, 1968;Pritchett, 1980] presumably indicates fluid pressures near lithostatic load. Along similar lines, Walder and Nur [1984] have suggested that seismic low-velocity zones in the crust may indicate regions of crystalline rock with nearly lithostatic fluid pressures.…”
Section: The Field Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%