Outline of a general model of measurement

Abstract

Measurement is a process aimed at acquiring and codifying information about properties of empirical entities. In this paper we provide an interpretation of such a process comparing it with what is nowadays considered the standard measurement theory, i.e., representational theory of measurement. It is maintained here that this theory has its own merits but it is incomplete and too abstract, its main weakness being the scant attention reserved to the empirical side of measurement, i.e., to measurement systems and to the ways in which the interactions of such systems with the entities under measurement provide a structure to an empirical domain. In particular it is claimed that (1) it is on the ground of the interaction with a measurement system that a partition can be induced on the domain of entities under measurement and that relations among such entities can be established, and that (2) it is the usage of measurement systems that guarantees a degree of objectivity and intersubjectivity to measurement results. As modeled in this paper, measurement systems link the abstract theory of measuring, as developed in representational terms, and the practice of measuring, as coded in standard documents such as the International Vocabulary of Metrology.

Invited Article: Concepts and tools for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty

“…The goal was not to measure Stanley's properties (even if some of them, like the geographical coordinates of its location, were measured in the process) but to navigate successfully from one location to another. In other words, Stanley was not regarded as a system under measurement, 27 although its control relied on inputs from several on-board measurement systems.…”

The Unreasonable Destructiveness of Political Correctness in Philosophy

“…Let M, , ⊕ and R, ≥, + be a pair of relational structures where M is the domain of a generic relational structure, is a binary ordering relation and ⊕ is an empirical binary operation of concatenation. Then R = M, , ⊕ is an extensive structure if and only if (adapted from [184,186]):…”

“…Several different accounts for the sufficient conditions for such an homomorphism to exist have been provided (see for instance [146] (p. 226), [184,186,187]), often motivated by constraints of empirical decidability. I employ a structure of this kind to characterize material wealth, but I leave it open which axioms are required to flesh it out properly.…”

Measurement theory and utility analysis in Suppes’ early work, 1951–1958

“…The axiomatic approach to the representational view of measurement was outlined by Suppes and Dana Scott (1958), developed by Suppes and Joseph Zinnes in a chapter of the Handbook of Mathematical Psychology (1963), and found its fullfledged expression in Foundations of Measurement, the book Suppes wrote in collaboration with David H. Krantz, R. Duncan Luce, and Amos Tversky and the first volume of which was published in 1971. In recent years, the axiomatic version of the representational view of measurement elaborated by Suppes and his co-authors has been criticized for paying inadequate attention to the empirical dimension of measurement (Boumans, 2015;Frigerio, Giordani, & Mari, 2010). However, it still represents the standard approach in measurement theory, and even scholars who are critical of it take the Foundations of Measurement as the starting point of their research.…”