1987
DOI: 10.3758/bf03208212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outline- and solid-angle orientation illusions have different determinants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
2

Year Published

1987
1987
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
13
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To the extent that our results can be compared to this perceptualleaming phenomenon, the direction of our interaction-real contours strongly influencing subjective contours, but not the reverse-appears opposite to the asymmetrical interaction that Vogels and Orban reported. Our finding of a small Bourdon illusion in Figure R-R is consistent with the earlier results of Rozvany and Day (1980), but contrary to the results of Wenderoth and O'Connor (1987b) and Wendoroth et al (1986), who found significant repulsion effects in real outline figures. In solid figures, Wenderoth and O'Connor (1987b) found significant Bourdon illlusions when the test contours were colinear, but there was no apparent displacement when the test contours were objectively bent.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To the extent that our results can be compared to this perceptualleaming phenomenon, the direction of our interaction-real contours strongly influencing subjective contours, but not the reverse-appears opposite to the asymmetrical interaction that Vogels and Orban reported. Our finding of a small Bourdon illusion in Figure R-R is consistent with the earlier results of Rozvany and Day (1980), but contrary to the results of Wenderoth and O'Connor (1987b) and Wendoroth et al (1986), who found significant repulsion effects in real outline figures. In solid figures, Wenderoth and O'Connor (1987b) found significant Bourdon illlusions when the test contours were colinear, but there was no apparent displacement when the test contours were objectively bent.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Our finding of a small Bourdon illusion in Figure R-R is consistent with the earlier results of Rozvany and Day (1980), but contrary to the results of Wenderoth and O'Connor (1987b) and Wendoroth et al (1986), who found significant repulsion effects in real outline figures. In solid figures, Wenderoth and O'Connor (1987b) found significant Bourdon illlusions when the test contours were colinear, but there was no apparent displacement when the test contours were objectively bent. However, we found significant displacements-unbending-in our objectively bent induction contours in four of the seven illusions in the present experiment (see Figure 3).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides the solid variety ofthe figure, outline versions also have been studied (Wenderoth & O'Connor, 1987). Day, Mitchell, and Stecher (1990) showed that the illusion in the solid variety occurs also with right angle and parallel edge figures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data from the visual illusion renders this unlikely. Wenderoth and O'Connor (1987) have shown that a small gap in the visual figure actually enhances the illusion. In any case, it is now clear that the visual illusion occurs strongly with a right angle arrangement of the components arranged base to base with an even greater angular gap between them .…”
Section: The Haptic Bourdon Illusion 403mentioning
confidence: 99%