2020
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2019.2911692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outliers-Robust CFAR Detector of Gaussian Clutter Based on the Truncated-Maximum-Likelihood- Estimator in SAR Imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the above theoretical analysis of T , the Duffing equation shown in (10) does not consider the interference of the ground clutter. Next, the anti-clutter performance of T is tested with the Duffing detection system shown in (13). A group of simulations are designed, which are divided into the following two cases.…”
Section: Obviously Jmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the above theoretical analysis of T , the Duffing equation shown in (10) does not consider the interference of the ground clutter. Next, the anti-clutter performance of T is tested with the Duffing detection system shown in (13). A group of simulations are designed, which are divided into the following two cases.…”
Section: Obviously Jmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conclusion, when using the Duffing detection system shown in (13) to classify FOD and false alarms, only the detection statistic T needs to be calculated. If…”
Section: Obviously Jmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…So far, many traditional SAR ship detection methods have been proposed, e.g., global thresholdbased [36][37][38], constant false alarm ratio (CFAR)-based [39][40][41], generalized likelihood ratio test (GLRT)-based [42][43][44], transformation domain-based [45][46][47], visual saliency-based [48][49][50], super-pixel segmentation-based [51][52][53], and auxiliary feature-based (e.g., ship-wake) [54][55][56], all of which obtained modest results in specific backgrounds, but these methods always extract ship features by hand-designed means, leading to complexity in computation, weakness in generalization, and trouble in manual feature extraction [1,4]. Moreover, as ship wakes do not exist all the time, and their features are not as obvious as ship targets, the research on the detection of ship wakes is not extensive [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%