2019
DOI: 10.1177/1368430219879223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outgroup morality perceptions mediate secondary transfer effects from direct and extended contact: Evidence from majority and minority group members

Abstract: The secondary transfer effect (STE), defined as contact with a primary outgroup improving attitudes towards a secondary outgroup uninvolved in contact, has mainly been studied with reference to direct contact and considering attitude generalization as the main mediating mechanism. Using a majority (422 Italians) and minority (130 immigrants) adolescent sample from high schools in Italy, we examined outgroup morality perceptions as a new mediating mechanism, and tested for the first time whether the STE emerges… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(127 reference statements)
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Addressing this concern, eight studies demonstrated the existence of the STE by using different measures of attitudes toward primary and secondary outgroups (e.g., Schmid et al., 2012; Vezzali, Di Bernardo et al., 2018). Especially strong support is provided by studies that used different conceptual measures for primary and secondary outgroups, for instance, assessing generalization from attitudes toward the primary outgroup to contact intentions toward the secondary outgroup (Vezzali et al., 2019).…”
Section: Methodological Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Addressing this concern, eight studies demonstrated the existence of the STE by using different measures of attitudes toward primary and secondary outgroups (e.g., Schmid et al., 2012; Vezzali, Di Bernardo et al., 2018). Especially strong support is provided by studies that used different conceptual measures for primary and secondary outgroups, for instance, assessing generalization from attitudes toward the primary outgroup to contact intentions toward the secondary outgroup (Vezzali et al., 2019).…”
Section: Methodological Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence that contact effects generalize to secondary outgroups has been obtained mainly with correlational (Brylka, Jasinskaja‐Lahti, & Mähönen, 2016; Hindriks et al., 2014; Pettigrew, 2009; Vezzali et al., 2019, 24 studies, see Table 3), but also with longitudinal (Bowman & Griffin, 2012; Mähönen & Jasinskaja‐Lahti, 2016; Tausch et al., 2010, Study 4; Turner & Feddes, 2011; Van Laar et al., 2005, seven studies, see Table 2), and experimental methodologies (Harwood et al., 2011; Jasinskaja‐Lahti et al., 2020; Li et al., 2016; Shook et al., 2016; but see Mark & Harris, 2012, 13 studies see Tables 1; note that the study by Van Laar et al., [2005] has been included both as an experimental and a longitudinal study, see Tables 1 and 2).…”
Section: Intergroup Contact and The Secondary Transfer Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Research on contact and morality has been largely unconnected (for exceptions, see Brambilla, Hewstone, & Colucci, 2013;Vezzali et al, 2017Vezzali et al, , 2019. In this study, we focus on moral licensing (Monin & Miller, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%