1994
DOI: 10.1016/0306-4522(94)90314-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outflow from the nucleus accumbens to the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus: A dissociation between locomotor activity and the acquisition of responding for conditioned reinforcement stimulated by d-amphetamine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
59
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
10
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have shown that integrity of PPTg is necessary for arousal, attention, motivation and learning, and, particularly interestingly here, stimulus-reward associations (Steckler et al, 1994b). Studies using a variety of conditioning tasks have suggested a role for PPTg in assigning task-specific salience value to cue signals (Inglis et al, 1994(Inglis et al, , 2000Florio et al, 1999;Kippin and van der Kooy, 2003). Consistent with this idea, some PPTg cells in cat were found to respond to conditioned stimuli in a context-dependent way, failing to respond to the same cue when another signal indicated a different task requirement (Dormont et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have shown that integrity of PPTg is necessary for arousal, attention, motivation and learning, and, particularly interestingly here, stimulus-reward associations (Steckler et al, 1994b). Studies using a variety of conditioning tasks have suggested a role for PPTg in assigning task-specific salience value to cue signals (Inglis et al, 1994(Inglis et al, , 2000Florio et al, 1999;Kippin and van der Kooy, 2003). Consistent with this idea, some PPTg cells in cat were found to respond to conditioned stimuli in a context-dependent way, failing to respond to the same cue when another signal indicated a different task requirement (Dormont et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…At the behavioral level, lesions of PPTg impair attention (Inglis et al, 2001) and the learning of associations between a conditioned stimulus and a primary reward (Inglis et al, 1994(Inglis et al, , 2000. Furthermore, some evidence from recordings in cats suggest that PPTg neuronal responses to auditory stimuli may be context dependent (Dormont et al, 1998), indicating a degree of plasticity similar to that seen in DA cell responses to predicted rewards (Schultz, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possibility may be via indirect projections from the ventral striatum to output structures such as the ventral pallidum (VP). The VP sends a substantial GABAergic projection to the brainstem, including the PPT (Inglis et al, 1994;Rye et al, 1988). Activation of MSN inhibitory outputs to the VP would in turn be expected to inhibit VP inhibitory influences on the PPT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activation of MSN inhibitory outputs to the VP would in turn be expected to inhibit VP inhibitory influences on the PPT. Although future experiments are required to directly test this hypothesis, it is noteworthy that the PPT is critically involved in mediating the rewarding properties of both intra-VTA and systemically administered nicotine (Corrigall et al, 2001;Lanc¸a et al, 2000;, and is functionally linked to NAshell output pathways (Inglis et al, 1994). Thus, although nicotine reward conditioning induced robust effects on spontaneous FSI vs MSN activity patterns within the NAshell, it is important to note that the VTA contains both DAergic and non-DAergic, largely GABAergic neuronal populations, both of which are activated by nicotine administration (Yin and French, 2000) and send both DAergic and GABAergic projections to the ventral striatum (Van Bockstaele and Pickel, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lesions or chemical inactivation of the PPTg has been found to disrupt reward-related responses, attentional performance, and stimulus-reward associations [134][135][136][137][138][139][140][141][142][143][144][145][146]. Consequently, the execution of conditioned reinforcement paradigms was compromised, but movement, per se, was preserved and subtle motor deficits were only evident if tasks were particularly demanding.…”
Section: The Role Of the Pptg In Predictive Reward Information And Rementioning
confidence: 99%