2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outdoor recreation in various landscapes: Which site characteristics really matter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
21
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
6
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lower values of recreation were found in Zakynthos, due the low coverage of forests and less diverse landscape. These results were consistent with the findings of De Valck et al [106], where in a mixed landscape including farmlands and forests, diversity was highly appreciated from recreationists.…”
Section: Mapping Ecosystem Servicessupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Lower values of recreation were found in Zakynthos, due the low coverage of forests and less diverse landscape. These results were consistent with the findings of De Valck et al [106], where in a mixed landscape including farmlands and forests, diversity was highly appreciated from recreationists.…”
Section: Mapping Ecosystem Servicessupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Therefore, we considered as very accessible sites in the BMG those areas that were in a buffer of 200 m around accessible roads to motor vehicles, and accessible sites those areas that were in a buffer of 200 m around limited roads to motor vehicles where the access was on foot [80]. Moreover, we considered that in a buffer of 500 m around natural and constructed infrastructures visitors could use the area for recreation [86]. The recreation opportunity was calculated aggregating the values of the two features described above, and giving equal weights to both of them.…”
Section: Recreationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These pictures and descriptions were used to assess the naturalness of forests closest to the respondents' residences (cf. [21][22][23][24]).…”
Section: The Survey Instrument and Its Structurementioning
confidence: 99%