2004
DOI: 10.1117/12.518558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outdoor chamber measurements of biological aerosols with a passive FTIR spectrometer

Abstract: Outdoor measurements of dry bacillus subtilis (BG) spores were conducted with a passive Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer using two types of chambers. One was a large open-ended cell, and the other was a canyon of similar dimensions. The canyon exposes the aerosol plume to downwelling sky radiance, while the open-ended cell does not. The goal of the experiments was to develop a suitable test methodology for evaluation of passive standoff detectors for open-air aerosol measurements. Dry BG aerosol … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A second technology that has been considered is passive infrared (IR) spectroscopy (single or multipixel), which offers no range information but has been exploited primarily as a detector for chemical vapor threats. 6 To date, passive IR has demonstrated a sensitivity to bioagents that is > 10 times higher (worse) than can be achieved with lidar [65]; however, if it is to be deployed as a chemical vapor sensor, it would be very useful to determine its use as a biosensor as well. There have been recent efforts to combine passive IR with lidar to provide a combined standoff detection system for both bio-and chem-agents [66].…”
Section: A Early Warningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second technology that has been considered is passive infrared (IR) spectroscopy (single or multipixel), which offers no range information but has been exploited primarily as a detector for chemical vapor threats. 6 To date, passive IR has demonstrated a sensitivity to bioagents that is > 10 times higher (worse) than can be achieved with lidar [65]; however, if it is to be deployed as a chemical vapor sensor, it would be very useful to determine its use as a biosensor as well. There have been recent efforts to combine passive IR with lidar to provide a combined standoff detection system for both bio-and chem-agents [66].…”
Section: A Early Warningmentioning
confidence: 99%