Outcomes used in randomised controlled trials of nutrition in the critically ill: a systematic review

Abstract

BackgroundNo evidence exists to date on which to base the selection of outcome measures for assessing nutritional interventions in critically ill patients. We conducted a systematic literature review to describe the outcomes used in recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing nutritional interventions in critically ill patients. Our objective was to set the foundation for the development of a core set of outcome measures for use in future RCTs.MethodsWe searched the PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for RCTs of nutritional interventions in critically ill patients aged 18 years or older, published and/or registered between January 2000 and August 2018. Outcomes were divided into six categories (mortality, length of stay, duration of organ dysfunction, complications, functional outcomes, and others) and analysed according to the study characteristics and publication year.ResultsOf the 885 references retrieved, 170 were included in the review. Of these, 136 (80%) defined a primary outcome, 114 (67%) defined secondary outcomes (two per study on average), and 34 (20%) did not specify whether outcomes were primary or secondary. We identified 24 different outcomes in all, of which 19 were primary. Complications were the most widely used primary outcome (65/136, 48%). Mortality was the primary outcome in 17/136 (13%) studies, with six different timepoints. The main secondary outcomes were length of stay (90/114, 79%), mortality (82/114, 72%), and duration of organ dysfunction (75/114, 65%).ConclusionsThis systematic review highlights the heterogeneity of outcomes used in recent randomized controlled trials evaluating nutritional interventions in critically ill patients. The results of our systematic review may have implications for designing future RCTs of nutritional interventions in the ICU.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2303-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Malnutrition, nutritional interventions and clinical outcomes of patients with acute small bowel obstruction: results from a national, multicentre, prospective audit

“…Studies in critical care on the use of PN have not demonstrated significant survival benefit and modest improvements in quality of life or time on ventilator 26 27. However, when trial results are assessed according to outcome, it appears that PN may be associated with reduced rates of complications of care 28. The pilot TOP-UP trial has suggested a benefit to supplemental PN in the surgical population 29.…”

Prise en charge nutritionnelle des patients de réanimation ayant une infection au SARS-CoV-2

“…Devant l’actuelle diminution des nouveaux cas sévères répertoriés, notre attention doit se focaliser sur la réhabilitation post-réanimation de ces patients, via des prises en charge multidisciplinaires leur permettant de regagner leur autonomie au plus vite [67] . Cette phase cruciale doit faire l’objet d’études de grande ampleur centrées sur des critères fonctionnels afin de faire progresser nos pratiques dans le futur [68] , [69] .…”

First international meeting of early career investigators: Current opportunities, challenges and horizon in critical care nutrition research

“…Selecting the optimal outcome measure is an essential component of all clinical research. However, this can be particularly challenging when designing clinical nutrition studies, demonstrated by the heterogeneous outcomes used in recent RCTs examining nutritional interventions in critically ill patients [60]. While a broad array of outcome measures are available (Table 1), the majority of RCTs in critical care nutrition focus on 'hard' clinical outcomes such as mortality, length of hospital stay and rates of infection and/or complications [40,61].…”