2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00787-019-01307-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of young people who reach the transition boundary of child and adolescent mental health services: a systematic review

Abstract: When young people reach the upper age limit of child and adolescent mental health services (CAMHS), care should be transferred to an adult mental health service (AMHS) if they require ongoing support. However, many young people experience a significant disruption of their care during this transition, whilst others may fail to transition at all. Currently, there is no systematic appraisal of the international evidence regarding the outcomes of young people after transition. A systematic review was conducted whi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
54
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(88 reference statements)
1
54
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Service pathways out of CAMHS at age 18 are diverse, as highlighted by Munson and Colleagues in their mental health services utilization framework [25]. Research has consistently shown that less than 50% of youth transitioning directly from CAMHS to AMHS [5,6,26]. Transition experiences of youth may be different based on their service pathway when they leave CAMHS care at age 18 [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Service pathways out of CAMHS at age 18 are diverse, as highlighted by Munson and Colleagues in their mental health services utilization framework [25]. Research has consistently shown that less than 50% of youth transitioning directly from CAMHS to AMHS [5,6,26]. Transition experiences of youth may be different based on their service pathway when they leave CAMHS care at age 18 [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been well-documented that transition from CAMHS to AMHS rarely goes smoothly, with young people experiencing distress, uncertainty, and discontinuity as they cross the service transition boundary (3)(4)(5). This is often due to young people experiencing disruption to their care, sometimes having several moves between services and/or clinicians during this time (6,7) and struggling to develop new therapeutic relationships (8). The transition from CAMHS can also be a difficult time for their parents, especially if they are excluded from decisions around their child's care once the young person is legally an adult (9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transitions from adolescent medium secure units in the UK are channelled by medicolegal processes, which further complicate transitions. However, most research studies have focused on transitions of care from mainstream CAMHS rather than forensic services (Appleton et al, 2019). Liddiard and colleagues (2019) highlight that poorly planned and executed transitions may lead to increasing rates of self-harming, readmission and relapse, yet few studies have included child and adolescent and adult secure services (Wheatley et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%