Outcomes of treatment of cats with feline infectious peritonitis using parenterally administered remdesivir, with or without transition to orally administered GS‐441524
Abstract:BackgroundNucleoside analog GS‐441524 is effective in treating cats with feline infectious peritonitis (FIP). Investigation into the use of parent nucleotide analog remdesivir (GS‐5734) is needed.ObjectivesTo assess efficacy and tolerability of remdesivir with or without transition to GS‐441524 in cats with FIP and document clinical and clinicopathologic progression over 6 months.AnimalsTwenty‐eight client‐owned cats with FIP.MethodsCats were prospectively recruited between May 2021 and May 2022. An induction … Show more
“…All other cats in both treatment groups have continued to remain in clinical remission of their disease. If it is assumed that this cat experienced a relapse of FIP, the relapse rate in this study (overall 8.3%) is similar to other studies that have a demonstrated relapse rate of 3.5-23% of cats treated with either GS-441524, remdesivir, or a combination of the medications [6,7,11,12].…”
Nucleoside analogs GS-441524 and remdesivir (GS-5734) are effective in treating cats with feline infectious peritonitis (FIP). However, no studies have compared the efficacy between antiviral medications. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of orally administered GS-442514 (12.5–15 mg/kg) compared to orally administered remdesivir (25–30 mg/kg) in a double-blinded non-inferiority trial. Eighteen cats with effusive FIP were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either GS-442514 or remdesivir. Cats were treated daily for 12 weeks and evaluated at week 0, 12, and 16. Survival and disease remission at week 16 were compared between groups. Five of 9 (55%) cats treated GS-441524 and 7/9 (77%) cats treated with remdesivir survived, with no difference in survival rate (p = 0.2). Remdesivir fulfilled the criteria for non-inferiority with a difference in survival of 22% (90% CI; −13.5–57.5%). Three of the 18 cats died within 48 h of enrollment. Excluding these cats, 5/6 (83%) of the cats treated with GS-441524 and 7/9 (77%) of the cats treated with remdesivir survived. These findings suggest that both orally administered GS-441524 and remdesivir are safe and effective anti-viral medications for the treatment of effusive FIP. Further optimization of the first 48 h of treatment is needed.
“…All other cats in both treatment groups have continued to remain in clinical remission of their disease. If it is assumed that this cat experienced a relapse of FIP, the relapse rate in this study (overall 8.3%) is similar to other studies that have a demonstrated relapse rate of 3.5-23% of cats treated with either GS-441524, remdesivir, or a combination of the medications [6,7,11,12].…”
Nucleoside analogs GS-441524 and remdesivir (GS-5734) are effective in treating cats with feline infectious peritonitis (FIP). However, no studies have compared the efficacy between antiviral medications. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of orally administered GS-442514 (12.5–15 mg/kg) compared to orally administered remdesivir (25–30 mg/kg) in a double-blinded non-inferiority trial. Eighteen cats with effusive FIP were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either GS-442514 or remdesivir. Cats were treated daily for 12 weeks and evaluated at week 0, 12, and 16. Survival and disease remission at week 16 were compared between groups. Five of 9 (55%) cats treated GS-441524 and 7/9 (77%) cats treated with remdesivir survived, with no difference in survival rate (p = 0.2). Remdesivir fulfilled the criteria for non-inferiority with a difference in survival of 22% (90% CI; −13.5–57.5%). Three of the 18 cats died within 48 h of enrollment. Excluding these cats, 5/6 (83%) of the cats treated with GS-441524 and 7/9 (77%) of the cats treated with remdesivir survived. These findings suggest that both orally administered GS-441524 and remdesivir are safe and effective anti-viral medications for the treatment of effusive FIP. Further optimization of the first 48 h of treatment is needed.
“…Bei 11 Katzen wurde die Therapie verlängert; 3 Katzen wurden aufgrund eines Rückfalls der Symptome erfolgreich erneut therapiert. Auch die Katzen dieser Studie zeigten Reizungen an den Injektionsstellen [ 76 ] .…”
ZusammenfassungDie feline infektiöse Peritonitis (FIP) ist eine der häufigsten
Infektionskrankheiten bei Katzen und verläuft unbehandelt
tödlich. Bisher gibt es in Deutschland keine legal verfügbare
wirksame Therapie. Therapieoptionen reichen von der symptomatischen Therapie
(z. B. Glukokortikoide, Propentofyllin) über immunmodulatorische
Ansätze (z. B. Interferone, Polyprenyl-Immunstimulanz) bis hin
zur antiviralen Therapie mit einem Protease-Inhibitor (z. B. GC376) oder
Nukleosid-Analoga (z. B. GS-441524, Remdesivir). Die symptomatische
Therapie führt nicht zur Heilung der FIP, sondern nur zu einer
kurzzeitigen Verbesserung der klinischen Symptome bei wenigen Katzen. Auch eine
immunmodulatorische Therapie stellte sich als wenig erfolgversprechend heraus.
Die antiviralen Medikamente GS-441524 und GC376 waren in mehreren Studien
hochwirksam und konnten das Leben vieler an FIP erkrankten Katzen retten. Beide
Wirkstoffe sind aktuell in Deutschland nicht zugelassen und können von
Tierärzten nicht legal angewendet werden. Katzen dürfen aktuell
nur in wenigen Ländern (z. B. Großbritannien und Australien)
legal mit GS-441524 therapiert werden. GS-441524 wird daher von Katzenbesitzern
in vielen anderen Ländern über den Schwarzmarkt bestellt und in
Eigenregie angewendet. Dieser Artikel gibt eine Übersicht über
verfügbare Therapieoptionen und einen Ausblick zur legalen Anwendung
wirksamer antiviraler Medikamente.
“…If untreated, FIP is invariably fatal. Recently, antiviral treatments have been established and demonstrated to be effective [ 1 , 2 , 3 ], although a few side effects have been reported [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ] and very little information is available about possible long-term effects [ 7 , 8 ]. Treatment is recommended where the drugs is legally available [ 3 ], but unfortunately, in the large majority of countries, the drug is not licensed; therefore, treatments are not allowed.…”
Background: Alpha-1 acid glycoprotein (AGP) may support a clinical diagnosis of feline infectious peritonitis (FIP). In this study, we assessed the analytical and diagnostic performances of a novel ELISA method to measure feline AGP. Methods: AGP was measured in sera and effusions from cats with FIP (n = 20) or with other diseases (n = 15). Precision was calculated based on the coefficient of variation (CV) of repeated testing, and accuracy was calculated by linearity under dilution (LUD). Results: The test is precise (intra-assay CVs: <6.0% in individual samples, <15.0% in pooled samples; inter-assay CVs <11.0% and <15.0%) and accurate (serum LUD r2: 0.995; effusion LUD r2: 0.950) in serum and in effusions. AGP is higher in cats with FIP than in other cats in both serum (median: 1968, I-III interquartile range: 1216–3371 μg/mL and 296, 246–1963 μg/mL; p = 0.009) and effusion (1717, 1011–2379 μg/mL and 233, 165–566 μg/mL; p < 0.001). AGP discriminates FIP from other diseases (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: serum, 0.760; effusion, 0.877), and its likelihood ratio is high (serum: 8.50 if AGP > 1590 μg/mL; effusion: 3.75 if AGP > 3780 μg/mL). Conclusion: This ELISA method is precise and accurate. AGP in serum and in effusions is a useful diagnostic marker for FIP.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.