2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04211-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of treatment and monitoring of posterior teeth with cracks: three-year results from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Cracked Tooth Registry (CTR) study was a prospective, observational 3-year cohort study of posterior teeth with visible cracks. The purpose of CTR was to ascertain the rate of crack progression and identify characteristics associated with this progression [18,19]. Patients were requested to return for 3 annual FU visit, and this visit was for the insertion/placement of the crown within 40 days [22].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The Cracked Tooth Registry (CTR) study was a prospective, observational 3-year cohort study of posterior teeth with visible cracks. The purpose of CTR was to ascertain the rate of crack progression and identify characteristics associated with this progression [18,19]. Patients were requested to return for 3 annual FU visit, and this visit was for the insertion/placement of the crown within 40 days [22].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the study conformed to recognized standards of the US Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects by seeking Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval for the five studies as described in study publications [18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Female gender, molar teeth, crack involving the distal or buccal surface and parafunction were independently associated with a decrease in symptoms, whilst the presence of mesial crack was associated with an increase. Moreover, about 80% of teeth among those initially recommended for monitoring progressed with a monitoring recommendation over a period of 3 years (Ferracane et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Monitoring Versus Restoringmentioning
confidence: 99%