2018
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve replacement for degenerated bioprostheses, failed annuloplasty rings, and mitral annular calcification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
240
3
14

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 282 publications
(275 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
18
240
3
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Left ventricular outflow obstruction (LVOTO) is a known possible complication of TMVR. In the TMVR registry, LVOTO was observed in 7.1% of patients with a higher incidence of 39.7% in MAC patients . This complication leads to more frequent need for intra‐procedural alcohol septal ablation in the MAC group.…”
Section: Mitral Annular/valve Calcification and Degenerative Mitral Smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Left ventricular outflow obstruction (LVOTO) is a known possible complication of TMVR. In the TMVR registry, LVOTO was observed in 7.1% of patients with a higher incidence of 39.7% in MAC patients . This complication leads to more frequent need for intra‐procedural alcohol septal ablation in the MAC group.…”
Section: Mitral Annular/valve Calcification and Degenerative Mitral Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the TMVR registry, LVOTO was observed in 7.1% of patients with a higher incidence of 39.7% in MAC patients. 59 This complication leads to more frequent need for intra-procedural alcohol septal ablation in the MAC group. All-cause 30-day mortality was 34.5%, which was significantly higher in the MAC group.…”
Section: Other Approaches To Severe Mac Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In adults, a recent study reported on transcatheter mitral valve implantation of patients with degenerated bioprostheses (valve‐in‐valve), failed annuloplasty rings (valve‐in‐ring), and severe mitral annular calcification (valve‐in‐mitral annular calcification). They found that all‐cause mortality was higher after “valve‐in‐mitral annular calcification” compared with “valve‐in‐ring” and “valve‐in‐valve” at 30 days (34.5% vs. 9.9% vs. 6.2%; log‐rank p < .001) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Recently, in TMVR multicentre registry, procedural and clinical outcomes of the valve in valve (ViV), valve in ring (ViR), and ViMAC were reported by Yoon et al 3 In this registry, PVL closure was more frequently performed in the ViR group compared with ViV and ViMAC groups (7.8 vs. 2.2 vs. 0.0%; p = 0.006). 3 We have some comments regarding the factors, which might potentially reduce the incidence of PVL in ViMAC. Firstly, assessment of MAC is important and often requires integration of multimodality imaging.…”
Section: Dear Editormentioning
confidence: 99%