Outcomes of surgically treated sialoceles in 21 cats: A multi‐institutional retrospective study (2010–2021)

Abstract

ObjectiveTo report the outcomes of cats that underwent surgical correction for sialoceles.Study designMulti‐institutional retrospective cohort study.AnimalsTwenty‐one client‐owned cats.MethodsMedical records were examined of cats diagnosed with sialocele, which underwent surgical intervention over an 11‐year period at one of 10 referral hospitals. The data collected included signalment, clinical signs, diagnostic imaging, histopathology, surgical procedures performed, and postoperative complications.ResultsThe most common presenting complaints for cats with sialocele included dysphagia and ptyalism. Only two cats had a recent history of trauma, and one was diagnosed with a concurrent sialolith. Most displayed visible tissue swelling, with ranulae being most common. Surgical treatment consisted of sialoadenectomy and/or marsupialization. Intraoperative complications occurred in three cats, and postoperative complications in five cats. No recurrence or development of contralateral sialoceles were reported during the follow‐up period (30–968 days).ConclusionThe majority of cats did not have a clear underlying cause for developing a sialocele. The sublingual and mandibular salivary glands were presumed to be the most commonly affected. Mandibular and sublingual sialoadenectomy and/or marsupialization provided resolution of clinical signs to the 21 cats that underwent these procedures.Clinical significanceSialocele, although rare, should remain a differential diagnosis when managing cats with relevant clinical signs. Surgical intervention appears to offer resolution of signs with apparently low overall risk of complication or short‐term recurrence. In cats it is necessary to evaluate whether sialoadenectomy is necessary, or whether marsupialization alone should be attempted as a less invasive first‐line surgical intervention.