2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.10.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of Revisions for Failed Trapeziometacarpal Joint Arthritis Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
11
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to the findings of a small matched-pair study showing neither any differences in pain nor hand function between patients after trapeziectomy for failed implant arthroplasty or primary trapeziectomy (Kaszap et al, 2013). Nevertheless, our scores are in line with or slightly better than those reported by other groups reporting on pain (lying between 2.8 and 4.2 on the numeric rating scale) after revision surgery (Mattila and Waris, 2019;Megerle et al, 2011;Munns et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is in contrast to the findings of a small matched-pair study showing neither any differences in pain nor hand function between patients after trapeziectomy for failed implant arthroplasty or primary trapeziectomy (Kaszap et al, 2013). Nevertheless, our scores are in line with or slightly better than those reported by other groups reporting on pain (lying between 2.8 and 4.2 on the numeric rating scale) after revision surgery (Mattila and Waris, 2019;Megerle et al, 2011;Munns et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few studies have investigated thumb CMC revision surgery and shown satisfactory outcomes; 50% to 75% of patients undergoing this procedure can expect good results (Cooney et al, 2006;Munns et al, 2019). However, the outcomes of revision surgery seem to be inferior to that of primary surgery (Munns et al, 2019;Sadhu et al, 2016). 1 To date, there has been a lack of clear guidelines advocating how patients with residual symptoms after trapeziectomy should be evaluated and treated further.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 La hiperextensión MCF sola o asociada con el choque entre el primer MC contra el remanente carpiano es causa de revisión de la trapecectomía. 7,8 Para evitar llegar a la cirugía de revisión lo ideal es tratar la articulación MCF en el mismo momento que la TMC, si se va a resecar el trapecio. Se han propuesto diferentes técnicas quirúrgicas para asociar cuando la hiperextensión supera los 30°, entre las que se incluyen la estabilización temporal con agujas (con pobres resultados), la capsulodesis volar, la transferencia a próximal y radial del extensor pollicis brevis (EPB) en el primer MC, la fusión de los sesamoideos (con la que se pierden de extensión) o la artrodesis de la articulación MCF.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Bei einem operativen Behandlungsversuch sollten Patienten zusätzlich auch über eine etwaige Verschlechterung der Symptomatik aufgeklärt werden. [24].…”
Section: Aufklärungunclassified