2005
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2004-09-3544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of reduced-intensity transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia: an analysis of prognostic factors from the Chronic Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT

Abstract: This study reports outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) in 186 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). The median age was 50 years, and 64% were in first chronic phase (CP1), CP2 13%, accelerated phase 17%, and blast crises 6%. The median EBMT transplant score was 3. The day 100 transplantation-related mortality (TRM) was 6.1% (confidence interval [CI], 3.4%-11%) but ros… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
89
2
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
89
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, in this analysis, SCT in CML was more frequently performed from unrelated than from related donors (55% vs. 45%), without any influence on survival in accordance to previous reports [13,14,24]. However, others suggested worsening of prognosis by unrelated SCT in subgroups of patients: An NMDP study described for those CML patients in chronic phase undergoing early transplantation in the first year from diagnosis a similar or only slightly inferior 5-year DFS after matched unrelated vs. matched sibling transplantation, while there was a substantially worse 5-year DFS after matched URD in case of delayed SCT.…”
Section: Comparison Of Patients With Standard and Reduced Intensity Csupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, in this analysis, SCT in CML was more frequently performed from unrelated than from related donors (55% vs. 45%), without any influence on survival in accordance to previous reports [13,14,24]. However, others suggested worsening of prognosis by unrelated SCT in subgroups of patients: An NMDP study described for those CML patients in chronic phase undergoing early transplantation in the first year from diagnosis a similar or only slightly inferior 5-year DFS after matched unrelated vs. matched sibling transplantation, while there was a substantially worse 5-year DFS after matched URD in case of delayed SCT.…”
Section: Comparison Of Patients With Standard and Reduced Intensity Csupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Therefore, allo-SCT took a shift towards advanced disease or cases with imatinib resistance [11,12]. Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) broadened transplantation strategies [13] and allowed the inclusion of patients with comorbidity, advanced disease, or higher age [14], who would have been excluded from SCT in former years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The score is valid independent of the pretreatment and holds even today with tyrosine kinase inhibitors as primary treatment. [13][14][15] Patients transplanted at an older age, in a more advanced disease stage, after a longer time interval from diagnosis with a donor other than an HLA identical sibling donor and with a female donor for a male recipient had uniformly a worse outcome compared with younger patients, transplanted still in first chronic phase within 1 year from diagnosis from an HLA identical sex-matched sibling donor.…”
Section: Risk Assessment; Ebmt Risk Scorementioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Several HSCT trials have attempted to lower toxicity in children by using approaches such as reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC), low-dose DLI, and so on. 26 The development of imatinib and subsequently other tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibitors that are successful at obtaining long-term cytogenetic response has changed therapeutic strategies for CML. However, TK inhibitors have not proven to be curative and HSCT still remains the only proven curative approach to children with CML.…”
Section: Chronic Myeloid Leukemiamentioning
confidence: 99%