Outcomes of psychotherapeutic and psychoeducative group interventions for children exposed to intimate partner violence

Pernebo, Karin; Fridell, Mats; Almqvist, Kjerstin

doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.02.014

Cited by 12 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…With regard to modality, pooled findings indicate that studies targeting the nonoffending parent (mother) had the highest pooled effect size (SMD = −0.38, 95% CI [−0.62 to −0.14], p < .01), followed by those that Graham-Bermann, Pernebo et al, 2018;Sullivan, Bybee, & Allen, 2002) or joint (Foshee et al, 2015;Waldman-Levi & Weintraub, 2009;Smith, Belton, Barnard, Fisher, & Taylor, 2015) programming. Three additional studies evaluated interventions delivered to children only (Kot, 1995;Smith & Landreth, 2003;Tyndall-Lind, Landreth, & Giordano, 2001;Wagar & Rodway, 1995).…”

Section: Modalitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Interestingly, no studies removed due to high risk of bias evaluated interventions delivered to the parent only. Most studies removed due to risk of bias evaluated family-based interventions in which parent-child pairs received separate but parallel (Graham-Bermann et al, 2007;Graham-Bermann,Pernebo et al, 2018;Sullivan, Bybee, & Allen, 2002) or joint(Foshee et al, 2015;…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The promotion of well‐being among children exposed to intimate partner violence: A systematic review of interventions

Latzman

Casanueva

Brinton

et al. 2019

Campbell Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Modalitymentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The promotion of well‐being among children exposed to intimate partner violence: A systematic review of interventions

Latzman

Casanueva

Brinton

et al. 2019

Campbell Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Fifteen studies were RCTs and five studies were non-randomized controlled trials (see Table 1 for specific references). Two of the studies used a matched control group who received no treatment (Hamama et al, 2011; Razuri et al, 2016), four studies utilized a TAU control group (Auslander et al, 2017; Brillantes-Evangelista, 2013; Jensen et al, 2014; Murray et al, 2015), six studies included a waitlist control (Barron et al, 2017; Carpenter et al, 2016; Church et al, 2012; Goldbeck et al, 2016; O’Callaghan et al, 2013; Shein-Szydlo et al, 2016) and seven studies used an active intervention as a comparison group (Bartlett et al, 2018; Dietz et al, 2012; Foa et al, 2013; Gosh Ippen et al, 2011; Mannarino et al, 2012; Overbeek et al, 2013; Pernebo et al, 2018). Further details on the study comparison conditions are presented in Table 1.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Review of Controlled-Trials for PTSD in Maltreated Children and Adolescents

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Child maltreatment is associated with elevated risk of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which can often present alongside comorbidities. While evidence-based treatments for PTSD in young people already exist, there remains ongoing clinical and academic debate about the suitability of these approaches, particularly cognitive-behavioral approaches, for young people who have been exposed to more complex traumatic experiences, such as maltreatment. We conducted an updated systematic review of the evidence-base for psychological treatments for PTSD, specifically for maltreated young people. Fifteen randomized controlled trials and five non-randomized controlled clinical trials satisfied the inclusion criteria. Trials included treatments ranging from trauma-focused CBT to creative-based therapies. Trauma-focused CBT remained the best supported treatment for children and adolescents following child maltreatment, with new evidence that symptom improvements are maintained at longer-term follow up. The evidence for other therapies remained limited, and there were concerns regarding methodological quality. Implications for treatment decision-making are discussed.

show abstract

“…Of the three studies identified, one intervention was delivered to the parents (with child outcomes collected), and two interventions were delivered directly to both the child and parent together. Pernebo et al (2018) designed a quasi-experimental study to measure the effectiveness of two group-based interventions for children who had witnessed domestic violence between their parents. Participants were 50 children aged 4-13 years, and their mothers (in all cases, the mother was the "nonoffending parent").…”

Section: Children Impacted By Parental Conflict or Domestic Violencementioning

confidence: 99%

The Evidence-Base for Psychodynamic Psychotherapy With Children and Adolescents: A Narrative Synthesis

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite a rich theoretical and clinical history, psychodynamic child and adolescent psychotherapy has been slow to engage in the empirical assessment of its effectiveness. This systematic review aims to provide a narrative synthesis of the evidence base for psychodynamic therapy with children and adolescents. Building on two earlier systematic reviews, which covered the period up to 2017, the current study involved two stages: an updated literature search, covering the period between January 2017 and May 2020, and a narrative synthesis of these new studies with those identified in the earlier reviews. The updated search identified 37 papers (28 distinct studies). When combined with papers identified in the earlier systematic reviews, this resulted in a combined total of 123 papers (82 distinct studies). The narrative synthesis of findings indicates that there is evidence of effectiveness for psychodynamic therapy in treating a wide range of mental health difficulties in children and adolescents. The evidence suggests this approach may be especially effective for internalizing disorders such as depression and anxiety, as well as in the treatment of emerging personality disorders and in the treatment of children who have experience of adversity. Both the quality and quantity of empirical papers in this field has increased over time. However, much of the research demonstrates a range of methodological limitations (small sample sizes, lack of control groups etc.), and only 22 studies were Randomized Controlled Trials. Further high-quality research is needed in order to better understand the effectiveness of psychodynamic psychotherapy for children and young people.

show abstract

Outcomes of psychotherapeutic and psychoeducative group interventions for children exposed to intimate partner violence

Cited by 12 publications

References 33 publications

The promotion of well‐being among children exposed to intimate partner violence: A systematic review of interventions

The promotion of well‐being among children exposed to intimate partner violence: A systematic review of interventions

A Systematic Review of Controlled-Trials for PTSD in Maltreated Children and Adolescents

The Evidence-Base for Psychodynamic Psychotherapy With Children and Adolescents: A Narrative Synthesis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About