2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00467-021-05103-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of paediatric kidney transplant recipients using the updated 2013/2017 Banff histopathological classification for antibody-mediated rejection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, Banff diagnostic criteria and categories are adjusted based on antecedent literature, and as they arise as a synthesis of several different studies, rarely fully align with literature on which they are based. Conversely, outcomes of AMR diagnoses according to their strict definitions in the Banff Classification have rarely been investigated for either their association with outcome, or their success in delineating which patients are eligible for a specific therapy; where this has been done, results show improved prediction of outcome with the 2013 version compared to the 2003/2007 Classification, and with the 2013 version compared to the 2017 Classification ( 25 , 26 ). Instead, researchers often use slightly different definitions for the categories, with bespoke combinations of components and cut-offs for defining AMR, instead of the strict definitions last proposed by Banff.…”
Section: Amr and Allograft Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, Banff diagnostic criteria and categories are adjusted based on antecedent literature, and as they arise as a synthesis of several different studies, rarely fully align with literature on which they are based. Conversely, outcomes of AMR diagnoses according to their strict definitions in the Banff Classification have rarely been investigated for either their association with outcome, or their success in delineating which patients are eligible for a specific therapy; where this has been done, results show improved prediction of outcome with the 2013 version compared to the 2003/2007 Classification, and with the 2013 version compared to the 2017 Classification ( 25 , 26 ). Instead, researchers often use slightly different definitions for the categories, with bespoke combinations of components and cut-offs for defining AMR, instead of the strict definitions last proposed by Banff.…”
Section: Amr and Allograft Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%