2020
DOI: 10.20524/aog.2020.0515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of over-the-scope clip application in various gastrointestinal indications: experience from a tertiary care in India

Abstract: Background Recent advances in endoscopic tools and techniques have allowed the minimally invasive management of iatrogenic gastrointestinal (GI) perforations and bleedings. However, surgery may be required in cases with larger defects and bleeding refractory to conventional endoscopic modalities. The use of over-the-scope clips (OTSC) has been shown to improve the outcomes in these patients compared with conventional treatment modalities. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of OTSC… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only 1 report of the OTSC clip was identified, prohibiting the further assessment of this clip. However, in a retrospective series, Chavan et al 12 reported that OTSC had technical and clinical success rates of 88.89% and 83.33%, respectively. The study also reported 4 (11.1%) technical failures: colonic perforations n=2; duodenal ulcer bleeding n=1; and esophageal metal stent fixation n=1; and 2 (9.5%) adverse events, including 1 partial duodenal obstruction and 1 delayed bleeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only 1 report of the OTSC clip was identified, prohibiting the further assessment of this clip. However, in a retrospective series, Chavan et al 12 reported that OTSC had technical and clinical success rates of 88.89% and 83.33%, respectively. The study also reported 4 (11.1%) technical failures: colonic perforations n=2; duodenal ulcer bleeding n=1; and esophageal metal stent fixation n=1; and 2 (9.5%) adverse events, including 1 partial duodenal obstruction and 1 delayed bleeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical success is known as the achievement of the intent outcome without the need for additional therapies within 30 days during the follow-up. Recurrence was defined by the repeated symptoms of bleeding, perforation, or fistula after endoscopic treatment during the 30 days of follow-up ( 11 , 19 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%