Abstract:BackgroundThe inherent challenges of selecting an acceptable donor for the increasing number and acuity of recipients has forced programs to take increased risks, including accepting donors with a cancer history (DWCH). Outcomes of organ transplantation using organs from DWCH must be clarified. We assessed transplant outcomes of recipients of organs from DWCH.Material/MethodsRetrospective analysis of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2014 identified 8385… Show more
“…51−54 Donor malignancy has not been shown to have an increased risk of early death or graft loss overall in solid organ transplant recipients, although hematologic and otolaryngotic tumors have been associated with decreased survival following heart transplant. 55 The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network has issued a consensus statement on donor malignancy. 56 There are only case reports of genetic syndromes in donors and no conclusions can be drawn.…”
“…51−54 Donor malignancy has not been shown to have an increased risk of early death or graft loss overall in solid organ transplant recipients, although hematologic and otolaryngotic tumors have been associated with decreased survival following heart transplant. 55 The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network has issued a consensus statement on donor malignancy. 56 There are only case reports of genetic syndromes in donors and no conclusions can be drawn.…”
“…Although far less common, donors with active or prior malignancy history are another potential source for organ donation with disease transmission. The largest study assessing this risk evaluated over 8000 potential Chinese donors across all age ranges with a positive cancer history resulting in over 700 organ transplants . While there was no increased incidence of cancer transmission, they found significantly worse survival in heart transplant recipients from donors with either hematologic or otorhinolaryngologic cancers but not with central nervous system tumors.…”
Background
Heart transplantation has become standard of care for pediatric patients with either end‐stage heart failure or inoperable congenital heart defects. Despite increasing surgical complexity and overall volume, however, annual transplant rates remain largely unchanged. Data demonstrating pediatric donor heart refusal rates of 50% suggest optimizing donor utilization is critical. This review evaluated the impact of donor characteristics surrounding the time of death on pediatric heart transplant recipient outcomes.
Methods
An extensive literature review was performed to identify articles focused on donor characteristics surrounding the time of death and their impact on pediatric heart transplant recipient outcomes.
Results
Potential pediatric heart transplant recipient institutions commonly receive data from seven different donor death‐related categories with which to determine organ acceptance: cause of death, need for CPR, serum troponin, inotrope exposure, projected donor ischemia time, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic results. Although DITs up to 8 hours have been reported with comparable recipient outcomes, most data support minimizing this period to <4 hours. CVA as a cause of death may be associated with decreased recipient survival but is rare in the pediatric population. Otherwise, however, in the setting of an acceptable donor heart with a normal echocardiogram, none of the other data categories surrounding donor death negatively impact pediatric heart transplant recipient survival.
Conclusions
Echocardiographic evaluation is the most important donor clinical information following declaration of brain death provided to potential recipient institutions. Considering its relative importance, every effort should be made to allow direct image visualization.
“…While a comprehensive exploration of all other donor comorbidities is not possible in this review, some other pertinent situations were considered. The presence of a donor history of oncologic disease was reviewed as a risk factor for solid organ transplantation using a retrospective review of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database showed no increased risk of early death or graft loss in recipients of a donor with oncologic history . Although notably, hematologic and otolaryngotic tumors were associated with decreased recipient survival following heart transplantation …”
Heart transplantation (HTx) is a treatment option for end‐stage heart failure in children. HTx is limited by the availability and acceptability of donor hearts. Refusal of donor hearts has been reported to be common with reasons for refusal including preexisting donor characteristics. This review will focus on the impact of donor characteristics and comorbidities on outcomes following pediatric HTx. A literature review was performed to identify articles on donor characteristics and comorbidities and pediatric HTx outcomes. There are many donor characteristics to consider when accepting a donor heart. Weight‐based matching is the most common form of matching in pediatric HTx with a donor‐recipient weight ratio between 0.7 and 3 having limited impact on outcomes. From an age perspective, donors <50 years can be carefully considered, but the impact of ischemic time needs to be understood. To increase the donor pool, with minimal impact on outcomes, ABO‐incompatible donors should be considered in patients that are eligible. Other factors to be considered when accepting an organ is donor comorbidities. Little is known about donor comorbidities in pediatric HTx, with most of the data available focusing on infections. Being aware of the potential infections in the donor, understanding the testing available and risks of transmission, and treatment options for the recipient is essential. There are a number of donor characteristics that potentially impact outcomes following pediatric HTx, but these need to be taken into consideration along with their interactions with recipient factors when interpreting the outcomes following HTx.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.