2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of invasive mediastinal nodal staging versus positron emission tomography staging alone for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison between imaging techniques and invasive methods in the mediastinal study causes controversy. According to Schonewolf et al (25) there would be no obvious advantages in invasive methods compared to the use of 18 F-FDG-PET/CT alone in the evaluation of mediastinal lymph nodes. In their experience, 236 patients were affected by NSCLC (a total of 257 lesions); of these, 180 patients were staged by single 18 F-FDG-PET/CT (199 lesions) while the other 56 patients (58 lesions) were subjected to invasive mediastinal nodal staging (IMNS), of which patients 52 underwent EBUS and 4 to mediastinoscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison between imaging techniques and invasive methods in the mediastinal study causes controversy. According to Schonewolf et al (25) there would be no obvious advantages in invasive methods compared to the use of 18 F-FDG-PET/CT alone in the evaluation of mediastinal lymph nodes. In their experience, 236 patients were affected by NSCLC (a total of 257 lesions); of these, 180 patients were staged by single 18 F-FDG-PET/CT (199 lesions) while the other 56 patients (58 lesions) were subjected to invasive mediastinal nodal staging (IMNS), of which patients 52 underwent EBUS and 4 to mediastinoscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical resection is the most effective treatment for now but the recurrence rate after having the surgery for 5 years is 30% [2]. Radiotherapy is also one of the optional treatments for patients with an unresectable area in early stage of lung cancer [3]. Unfortunately, only 16% of patients present with localized diseases at the time of initial diagnosis, and the vast majority of patients are diagnosed with regional (22%) or distant (57%) metastasis and lose the opportunity for surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is similar to the sensitivity and NPV of 79-81% and 93%, respectively, achieved with invasive mediastinal staging via EBUS/EUS or mediastinoscopy (24). In a recent multicenter analysis of 233 patients with ES-NSCLC who received definitive treatment with SBRT, pretreatment staging with invasive mediastinal lymph node staging in addition to PET/CT (180 patients, 199 lesions) did not result in an increase in regional failures compared with PET/CT staging alone (56 patients, 58 lesions) (11% PET/CT vs. 21% PET + mediastinal staging, P>0.05) (25). Therefore, mediastinal staging without the use of invasive procedures may be a reasonable approach for regional lymph node assessment.…”
Section: Work-upmentioning
confidence: 95%