2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.07.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy in technically challenging cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Median operative time was 3.3 hours (IQR = 1.5 h), with median blood loss of 60 mL (IQR = 150 mL). Thirty-one (7.9%) patients needed transfusion, with a median of two units transfused (range [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred in 3.0% and 12.2%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Median operative time was 3.3 hours (IQR = 1.5 h), with median blood loss of 60 mL (IQR = 150 mL). Thirty-one (7.9%) patients needed transfusion, with a median of two units transfused (range [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred in 3.0% and 12.2%, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total conversion rate for these simple nephrectomies was 12.8% (15), with 10.3% (12) necessitating open conversion. For each approach, conversion occurred in 12% to 13% of cases, although only 4/7 conversions were to an open procedure for TPL, whereas all four conversions for both HAL and RPL were to an open procedure.…”
Section: Surgical Indicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, disadvantages of open surgery are well known, including wider incision, more analgesics requirement, greater post-operative discomfort and pain, prolonged hospital stay, as well as longer convalescence period. Some urologists proposed that hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy could help dissection of kidney and control of renal hilum, so as to reduce complications and shorten operative time ( 4 - 6 ). However, the incision is similarly longer and the injury is greater in this technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La duración de la cirugía y la pérdida sanguínea estimadas fueron de 210 minutos y 310 ml, respectivamente, con una estancia hospitalaria media de tres días. Estos datos son similares a los de otros grupos que trataron casos técnicamente complejos 6 : masas renales mayores de 7 cm 7 y de 10 cm 8 , o cuadros con intensa inflamación perirrenal 9 . Ningún paciente requirió conversión a cirugía abierta.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified