2010 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) 2010
DOI: 10.1109/bibm.2010.5706568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of gene association analysis of cancer microarray data are impacted by pre-processing algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although 118 primary studies were reviewed in this SLR, which were identified based on clear evidence regarding techniques applied to address key data-related issues, the number of SLR [169] N N N Y 1.0 [170] N N N Y 1.0 [171] N N N Y 1.0 [172] N N N Y 1.0 [173] N Y N Y 2.0 [174] N N N Y 1.0 [175] N N N Y 1.0 [176] N N N Y 1.0 [177] N N N Y 1.0 [178] N N N Y 1.0 [179] N N N Y 1.0 [180] N N N Y 1.0 [181] N N N Y 1.0 [182] N N N Y 1.0 Table 25 QA evaluation part 7 Primary study's reference ID QA1 QA2 QA3 QA4 Total score [183] N P N Y 1.5 [184] N P N Y 1.5 [185] N N N Y 1.0 [186] N N N Y 1.0 [187] N N N Y 1.0 [188] N N N Y 1.0 [189] N Y P Y 2.5 [190] N N N Y 1.0 [191] N N N Y 1.0 [192] N N N Y 1.0 [193] N N N Y 1.0 [194] N N N Y 1.0 [195] N N N Y 1.0 [196] N N N Y 1.0 [197] N N N Y 1.0 [198] N N N Y 1.0 [199] N N N Y 1.0 [200] N N N Y 1.0 [201] N N N Y 1.0 [202] N N N Y 1.0 [203] N N N Y 1.0 [204] N N N Y 1.0 [205] N N N Y 1.0 [206] N N N Y 1.0 [207] N N N Y 1.0 [208] N N N Y 1.0 studies on data preprocessing identified in this review is discou...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although 118 primary studies were reviewed in this SLR, which were identified based on clear evidence regarding techniques applied to address key data-related issues, the number of SLR [169] N N N Y 1.0 [170] N N N Y 1.0 [171] N N N Y 1.0 [172] N N N Y 1.0 [173] N Y N Y 2.0 [174] N N N Y 1.0 [175] N N N Y 1.0 [176] N N N Y 1.0 [177] N N N Y 1.0 [178] N N N Y 1.0 [179] N N N Y 1.0 [180] N N N Y 1.0 [181] N N N Y 1.0 [182] N N N Y 1.0 Table 25 QA evaluation part 7 Primary study's reference ID QA1 QA2 QA3 QA4 Total score [183] N P N Y 1.5 [184] N P N Y 1.5 [185] N N N Y 1.0 [186] N N N Y 1.0 [187] N N N Y 1.0 [188] N N N Y 1.0 [189] N Y P Y 2.5 [190] N N N Y 1.0 [191] N N N Y 1.0 [192] N N N Y 1.0 [193] N N N Y 1.0 [194] N N N Y 1.0 [195] N N N Y 1.0 [196] N N N Y 1.0 [197] N N N Y 1.0 [198] N N N Y 1.0 [199] N N N Y 1.0 [200] N N N Y 1.0 [201] N N N Y 1.0 [202] N N N Y 1.0 [203] N N N Y 1.0 [204] N N N Y 1.0 [205] N N N Y 1.0 [206] N N N Y 1.0 [207] N N N Y 1.0 [208] N N N Y 1.0 studies on data preprocessing identified in this review is discou...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%