Feature Editor's Note-Despite significant advances in medical management and availability of durable mechanical circulatory support devices to treat end-stage heart disease, no therapy to date has provided the survival benefit afforded by heart transplantation. For an adult patient who received a heart transplant worldwide between 2002 and 2008, median survival following heart transplantation now extends to 12.2 years (Lund LH. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36:1037-46). Despite the significant increase in the number of heart transplant procedures performed in the United States over the past 10 years as a result of the expansion of acceptable donor criteria and the opioid epidemic (Durand CM. Ann Intern Med. 2018;168:702-11), heart transplantation has been chronically plagued by donor shortages that have limited the overall epidemiologic benefit of this therapy. Recently, there has been a growing interest in using heart organs obtained from donors following circulatory death (ie, donation after circulatory death [DCD]) to expand the heart donor pool (see the recent report by Chew and colleagues. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:1447-59). In this issue of the Journal, Jawitz and Milano provide a timely and thoughtful review of the state of DCD heart transplantation and the report by Chew and colleagues. Jawitz and Milano review recent compelling evidence from Australia and the United Kingdom on DCD heart transplantation and present a very cogent argument why such a strategy should be implemented in the United States. Despite a robust experience with DCD transplantation of lungs, livers, and kidneys in the United States, DCD heart transplantation carries inherent clinical challenges, including ensuring equivalent clinical outcomes to brain-death donors, ethical issues in management of the donor, and increase in resource use to sustain a DCD heart-transplant program. As put forth by Kawitz and Milano, a significant ethical and clinical framework for DCD heart donation in the United States has been made by groundbreaking efforts in Australia and the United Kingdom. Because of the dire need for donor hearts, it is clinically necessary to resolve these controversies and challenges to expand the current heart donor pool in the United States.