2005
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.187.1.68
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of crises before and after introduction of a crisis resolution team

Abstract: CRTs may prevent some admissions and patients prefer them, although other outcomes appear unchanged in the short term.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
109
3
14

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(23 reference statements)
7
109
3
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies of CRHT have reported significantly reduced admission rates and length of hospital stay particularly where they provided 24 hour care Johnson et al, 2005). However, another study reported readmission rates remained stable (Barker, Taylor, Kader, Stewart, & Le Fevre, 2011).…”
Section: Crisis Resolution/home Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Studies of CRHT have reported significantly reduced admission rates and length of hospital stay particularly where they provided 24 hour care Johnson et al, 2005). However, another study reported readmission rates remained stable (Barker, Taylor, Kader, Stewart, & Le Fevre, 2011).…”
Section: Crisis Resolution/home Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Studies exploring the impact of CRHT have had small response rates (e.g. Barker, et al, 2011;Johnson, et al, 2005). Those who have had less positive experiences with services and who remain unwell might be less likely to participate (Barker, et al, 2011).…”
Section: Methodological Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Outcomes of CRHT team intervention include reduced length of stay (Johnson et al, 2005), reduced rates of admission where teams provide out-of-hours cover (Johnson et al, 2005;Glover et al, 2006), costeffectiveness (Joy et al, 2001), high satisfaction among users and families (Dean et al, 1993;Joy et al, 2001;Johnson et al, 2005), and better staff morale (Minghella et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of CRHT teams on reducing the rates and duration of admission to general adult psychiatry wards is no longer in doubt. [2][3][4] Given this success, there are surprisingly few similar service provisions for those above the age of 65 years, despite evidence for their efficacy in this age group. Dibben et al 5 have shown a reduction in hospital admissions and increased carer satisfaction with the introduction of CRHT teams in older people's mental healthcare.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%