2022
DOI: 10.3390/jpm12040555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of Conversion Surgery for Metastatic Gastric Cancer Compared with In-Front Surgery Plus Palliative Chemotherapy or In-Front Surgery Alone

Abstract: The survival benefits of conversion surgery in patients with metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) remain unclear. Thus, this study aimed to determine the outcomes of conversion surgery compared to in-front surgery plus palliative chemotherapy (PCT) or in-front surgery alone for mGC. We recruited 182 consecutive patients with mGC who underwent gastrectomy, including conversion surgery, in-front surgery plus PCT, and in-front surgery alone at Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital from 2011 to 2019. The tumor was staged… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, a metastatic pattern was not significantly associated with prognosis, nor were comorbidities. This is in agreement with results from previous studies that demonstrate no survival difference between initial metastatic sites [15,21,22]. Favorable long-term survival in patients with multiple metastases in our results is unreasonable, and this may be because patients with multiple metastases who received conversion surgery were highly responsive to chemotherapy; only patients whose multiple metastatic tumors regressed very well after chemotherapy could be selected for surgery, and thus their great chemosensitivity might have led to favorable long-term survival.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, a metastatic pattern was not significantly associated with prognosis, nor were comorbidities. This is in agreement with results from previous studies that demonstrate no survival difference between initial metastatic sites [15,21,22]. Favorable long-term survival in patients with multiple metastases in our results is unreasonable, and this may be because patients with multiple metastases who received conversion surgery were highly responsive to chemotherapy; only patients whose multiple metastatic tumors regressed very well after chemotherapy could be selected for surgery, and thus their great chemosensitivity might have led to favorable long-term survival.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…So-called "conversion surgery" benefits from higher R0 resection and pathological response rates, as well as the clearance of free cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity. Indeed, retrospective analyses, including a meta-analysis and nationwide analysis, demonstrated the survival benefit of conversion surgery compared to primary gastrectomy, plus postoperative chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone [13][14][15]. In addition, a prospective phase 2 trial (AIO-FLOT3) had a median OS of 22.9 months for patients with limited metastatic gastric cancer treated via conversion surgery [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We read, with great interest, the article by Huang Ruo-Yi and colleagues entitled “Outcomes of Conversion Surgery for Metastatic Gastric Cancer Compared with In-Front Surgery Plus Palliative Chemotherapy or In-Front Surgery Alone”, published on 1 April 2022 [ 1 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We thank the authors for their interest in our article “Outcomes of Conversion Surgery for Metastatic Gastric Cancer Compared with In-Front Surgery Plus Palliative Chemotherapy or In-Front Surgery Alone” [ 1 ]. We also acknowledge their critical insight and sharing their data regarding the evaluation on peritoneal carcinomatosis [ 2 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%