2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.06.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of Children With Restrictive Cardiomyopathy Listed for Heart Transplant: A Multi-institutional Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
38
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…26 It is clear that this exceeds the natural history of typical survival for RCM patients (for whom there is no proven medical therapy that will enhance survival) and suggests that listing early in the course of the disease is generally warranted. 8 A relatively low wait-list mortality in children with RCM was observed recently by Zangwill and colleagues (in an analysis of data from the Pediatric Heart Transplant Study), 25 and both their findings, and our own, suggest that improved survival in comparison with the historical literature reflects an aggressive approach to listing and early transplantation in the current era. The Pediatric Heart Transplant Study also documented that infant age, the need for inotropic agents, mechanical ventilation, and mechanical circulatory support are important risk factors for death while waiting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…26 It is clear that this exceeds the natural history of typical survival for RCM patients (for whom there is no proven medical therapy that will enhance survival) and suggests that listing early in the course of the disease is generally warranted. 8 A relatively low wait-list mortality in children with RCM was observed recently by Zangwill and colleagues (in an analysis of data from the Pediatric Heart Transplant Study), 25 and both their findings, and our own, suggest that improved survival in comparison with the historical literature reflects an aggressive approach to listing and early transplantation in the current era. The Pediatric Heart Transplant Study also documented that infant age, the need for inotropic agents, mechanical ventilation, and mechanical circulatory support are important risk factors for death while waiting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…cated by the change in availability of transplantation for this condition. 24,25 Survival curves are censored at the time of transplantation, and the natural history of this condition is no longer discernable. Even more pronounced distinction from DCM and HCM is noted when one analyzes freedom from transplantation and freedom from the composite end point of death or transplantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors reported outcomes in 1320 children with CMP (83% with dilated CMP and 17% with nondilated CMP) listed for HT during 1993-2006. 6,[8][9][10] The overall wait-list mortality was higher at 17% reflecting the earlier era (versus 11% for the composite wait-list end point in the current analysis), and posttransplant 1-year survival was 91%. Children with nondilated CMP (particularly those <1 year) and black children were reported to be at higher risk of wait-list mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…2 Finally, wait-list and posttransplant outcomes in children with dilated and nondilated CMP seem to have improved compared with the PHTS analyses. 6,[8][9][10] The interaction of CMP phenotype with ventilator support as a determinant of wait-list mortality is an important new finding and may be explained by examining current management options in children supported on a ventilator at listing. Although assisted ventilation can be lifesaving in children with severe heart failure, ventilator dependence is an accepted indication for VAD implantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the PHTS has previously published analyses of risk factors among patient subgroups, 5,6,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] it has never examined risk factors in detail among the entire population of pediatric transplant recipients. Given this background, using the available data from the PHTS group, we aimed to identify independent risk factors for 1-year graft loss in pre-HTx children after stratifying by disease pathogenesis (CHD and cardiomyopathy) and to assess our ability to accurately predict graft loss using available risk factor data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%