2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of Catheter-Directed Therapy Plus Anticoagulation Versus Anticoagulation Alone for Submassive and Massive Pulmonary Embolism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although not examined in this study, other known benefits of PERT that could have led to improved outcomes include reduced time to anticoagulation, individualized anticoagulant choice, improved outpatient follow‐up, and increased medication compliance 11 . In addition, Hennemeyer et al showed lower readmission in PE patients who underwent catheter‐direct therapy compared to those who received anticoagulation alone 15 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Although not examined in this study, other known benefits of PERT that could have led to improved outcomes include reduced time to anticoagulation, individualized anticoagulant choice, improved outpatient follow‐up, and increased medication compliance 11 . In addition, Hennemeyer et al showed lower readmission in PE patients who underwent catheter‐direct therapy compared to those who received anticoagulation alone 15 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…After thrombectomy, the patient's clinical improvement correlated with the recovery of cardiac function. One study reports an advantage of catheter-directed thrombectomy over treatment with anticoagulation only in patients with submassive PE, as reflected by an improvement in the right/left ventricular ratio [15] . Except for mild to moderate cardiac arrhythmias, the patient tolerated the procedure well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Two previous trials assessing the efficacy of CDT versus systemic thrombolysis demonstrated improved cardiovascular haemodynamics following CDT administration of tissue plasminogen activator, with no increased risk of intracranial haemorrhaging in CDT. 28,29 Moreover some investigators support catheter-directed treatment as a potential first-line therapeutic approach for Covid-19. 30 However, large studies are warranted to determine the optimal dosing regimen of systemic thrombolysis and CDT with or without therapeutic anticoagulation in COVID-19 ARDS .…”
Section: Catheter-directed Thrombolysismentioning
confidence: 99%