2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.08.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outcomes of Biventricular Repair for Congenitally Corrected Transposition of the Great Arteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lim et al (9) report on biventricular repair for congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (CCTGA). These authors studied 167 patients with CCTGA who underwent biventricular repairs.…”
Section: Transposition Of the Great Arteriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lim et al (9) report on biventricular repair for congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (CCTGA). These authors studied 167 patients with CCTGA who underwent biventricular repairs.…”
Section: Transposition Of the Great Arteriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Seoul) published a multi institutional study of 167 biventricular repair for ccTGA corrected transposition, and the group included 5 physiologic 1.5 ventricular repairs and 14 anatomic 1.5 ventricular repairs. [19] There was no mortality in either of the 1.5 ventricle repair groups, and the authors concluded that the strategy is a useful option for Rastelli unsuitable cases with hypoplasia or dysfunction of the right ventricle. There are some possible benefits of the 1.5 ventricle repair, which are summarized in Table 4.…”
Section: Other Repairs Involving Septationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19] The authors could not demonstrate significant differences between the two strategies. Bove et al .…”
Section: Anatomic Repairsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the Senning procedure became the most commonly used technique for the atrial switch in published series of the double-switch techniques. 3,[18][19][20][21] It tends to rely on fixed anatomical landmarks and so is potentially more reproducible, even in case of unusual anatomy, as compared with the Mustard procedure, which has been described with variable techniques. Nevertheless, enthusiasts of the Mustard procedure point out that not all studies have shown a difference comparing late outcomes of the 2 techniques 7 and the argument continues to this day.…”
Section: Figure 11mentioning
confidence: 99%