Outcomes of a Prospective Trial of Student-Athlete Drug Testing: The Student Athlete Testing Using Random Notification (SATURN) Study

Goldberg, Linn; Elliot, Diane L.; MacKinnon, David P.; Moe, Esther; Kuehl, Kerry S.; Yoon, Myeongsun; Taylor, Alasdair; Williams, J.R.

doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.001

Cited by 47 publications

(40 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous studies yielded ambiguous findings, 4 and other findings from the DuPont et al study were more equivocal than those cited here, including no change in use patterns for substances not included in their drug testing panels, a substantial concern because school-based drug testing generally does not include the substance most commonly used by adolescents: alcohol. The total number of positive drug test results (and presumably number of treatment referrals) in each study was low, and it was lower than expected on the basis of student self-reported drug use, suggesting that the students who reduced their use had low levels of substance use in the first place.…”

Section: Introductioncontrasting

confidence: 74%

Adolescent Drug Testing Policies in Schools

Levy¹,

Schizer²

2015

Pediatrics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductioncontrasting

confidence: 74%

Adolescent Drug Testing Policies in Schools

Levy¹,

Schizer²

2015

Pediatrics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, there was no impact on new users and evaluation of the pilot and follow up studies suggested risk factors increased (Goldberg et al, 2003;Goldberg et al, 2007). Across studies other outcomes commonly assessed included intentions to use IPEDs, and a range of measures of attitudes, knowledge and subjective norms (summarised in Table 1).…”

Section: [Insert Table 2 Here]mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Two interventions associated with reductions in IPED use (Elliot et al, 2004;Nilsson et al, 2004) were the only interventions where participants received information on other people's perceptions about healthy behaviours ('Information about others' approval'). Interventions associated with increases in undesirable attitudes (Elbe and Brand, 2016;Goldberg et al, 2003;Goldberg et al, 2007) and perceived norms (Goldberg et al, 2003;Goldberg et al, 2007) were studies for which just one BCT was identified, and were not educational.…”

Section: [Insert Table 2 Here]mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Elbe, 2016 Barkoukis, 2016Goldberg, 1990Tricker, 1996 Wippert, 2016 Goldberg, 1991Laure, 19992002Nilsson, 2004Elliot, 2004Goldberg, 1996a1996bGoldberg 20032007 Jalilian, 2011 Sagoe, 2016 Trenhaile, 1997…”

Section: Coercion (N=1)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Use of AS increased slightly following the ATLAS intervention, but at a lower rate than amongst controls (Goldberg et al, 1996b). Numbers reporting AS use were low throughout the evaluation however and the differences between groups were not statistically significant.Evaluation of the pilot study of random drug testing in a small sample of school athletes was suggested to have had a positive impact upon past month IPED use (Goldberg et al, 2003).However, there was no impact on new users and evaluation of the pilot and follow up studies suggested risk factors increased (Goldberg et al, 2003;Goldberg et al, 2007). Across studies other outcomes commonly assessed included intentions to use IPEDs, and a range of measures of attitudes, knowledge and subjective norms (summarised in Table 1).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A systematic review investigating the behaviour change strategies in interventions to prevent misuse of anabolic steroids

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A systematic review investigating the behaviour change strategies in interventions to prevent misuse of anabolic steroids.http://researchonline.ljmu.ac.uk/7477/ Article LJMU has developed LJMU Research Online for users to access the research output of the University more effectively. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LJMU Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain.The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of the record. Please see the repository URL above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription. Astract:This review aimed to examine strategies applied in interventions to prevent image and performance enhancing drug use in the context of intervention effectiveness. Comprehensive searches identified 14 interventions that met review inclusion criteria. Interventions were predominantly educational and delivered within school sport settings, but targeted a wide range of mediating factors. Identification of effective components was limited across studies by brief or imprecise descriptions of intervention content, lack of behavioural outcome measures and short-term follow up times; however studies with components in addition to information provision may be more promising. Interventions are required outside of sport settings to reflect the transition of this form of substance use to the general population. 2 Introduction Anabolic steroidsAnabolic steroids (AS) are the most prominent of a range of substances used to modify appearance and performance known as image and performance enhancing drugs (IPEDs).Globally the lifetime prevalence of AS has been estimated at 3.3%, with higher prevalence amongst males (6.4%) (Sagoe et al., 2014b), and it is suggested that nearly one third of AS users will develop a form of dependence (Pope et al., 2014a). Although AS can be used without adverse consequences, such as when used therapeutically, risk of harm increases with the far greater doses observed when AS are used outside of clinical settings (Harmer, 2010).Additionally, the quality of illicitly produced AS cannot be controlled and those using them frequently do so as part of complex IPED regimens. This misuse of AS is associated with a range of acute and chronic adverse consequences (Pope et al., 2014b) that range greatly from cosmetic (e.g. acne) to critical (e.g. cardiovascular disease, liver function) with evidence of potential psychological harms (e.g. increased aggression, mania) (ACMD, 2010b). Harms appear to increase with long-term use, which may be characterised by polypharmacy, long or continuous cycles of use, body image disturbance and obsession with training and diet (Kanayama et al., 2009).The majority of th...

show abstract